Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?
- First Online:
- 383 Downloads
This paper describes the different forms of and tries to give reasons for international scientific collaboration in general. It focuses on eleven countries in the Asia–Pacific region by evaluating their national research output with the help of bibliometric indicators in particular. Over two million journal articles published by these countries between 1998 and 2007 in ISI-listed periodicals are analyzed. Discipline-specific publication and citation profiles reveal national strengths and weaknesses in the different research domains. The exponential increase in publication output by China over the last few years is astonishing, but in terms of visibility, i.e. citation rates, China cannot keep up with leading science nations, remaining below the world average. A discipline-specific analysis shows that Chinese authors took an active part in more than a quarter of all articles and reviews published in the field of materials science in 2007, while their contribution to medical research is very low. Co-publication networks among the eleven countries are generated to observe the development of cooperation bonds in the region. Applying Salton’s measure of international collaboration strength, an above-average strengthening of scientific collaboration in the Asia–Pacific region can be observed.
KeywordsScientific cooperation Country level study Discipline specific publication profiles Asia–Pacific Research Area
- Evers, H.-D., Gerke, S., & Schweißhelm, R. (2004). Malaysia, Singapur, Indonesien: Wege zur Wissensgesellschaft. South East Asian Studies Working Paper No. 20. Bonn: Department of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Bonn. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/evifa/documents/books/reV5yMIeTTSYI/PDF/239Wf25iK8dcI.pdf.
- Georghiou, L. (1997) Global cooperation in research (Vol. 27, pp. 611–626). In Paper presented at the conference on the past and future of EU research funding-framework programmes under consideration, June 16–17, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2007). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gómez, I., & Méndez, A. (1992). Are peripheral countries profiting from scientific cooperation networks? In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 112–123). Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
- Gupta, B. M., Munshi, M., & Mishra, P. K. (2004). Regional collaboration in S&T among South Asian countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(4), 121–132.Google Scholar
- Haustein, S., Mittermaier, B., & Tunger, D. (2008). Bibliometric analysis Asia-Pacific Research area commissioned by the International Bureau of the BMBF at DLR. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.kooperation-international.de/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/redaktion/doc/Bibliometrie_Asien_englisch_neu.pdf&t=1268142711&hash=311621d7ca9cd94af219c315eb9ba97e.
- Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Networks of international scientific collaboration. In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 95–111). Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
- Martinez, C., & Moore, T. (2008, October). China goes from strength to strength. Inspec Matters.Google Scholar
- Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
- Tunger, D. (2009). Bibliometrische Verfahren und Methoden als Beitrag zur Trendbeobachtung und -erkennung in den Naturwissenschaften. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek, Verlag. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/12294/1/Bibliothek_19_uni.pdf.
- Tunger, D., & Haustein, S. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of the Asia-Pacific research area: Issues and results. In Proceedings of ISSI 2009—12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 2, pp. 996–997).Google Scholar
- Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1357.0.pdf.
- Wagner, C. S., Yezril, A., & Hassell, S. (2001). International cooperation in research and development. An update to an inventory to U.S. government spending. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1248.pdf.