, Volume 86, Issue 3, pp 727–746 | Cite as

Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?

  • Stefanie Haustein
  • Dirk Tunger
  • Gerold Heinrichs
  • Gesa Baelz


This paper describes the different forms of and tries to give reasons for international scientific collaboration in general. It focuses on eleven countries in the Asia–Pacific region by evaluating their national research output with the help of bibliometric indicators in particular. Over two million journal articles published by these countries between 1998 and 2007 in ISI-listed periodicals are analyzed. Discipline-specific publication and citation profiles reveal national strengths and weaknesses in the different research domains. The exponential increase in publication output by China over the last few years is astonishing, but in terms of visibility, i.e. citation rates, China cannot keep up with leading science nations, remaining below the world average. A discipline-specific analysis shows that Chinese authors took an active part in more than a quarter of all articles and reviews published in the field of materials science in 2007, while their contribution to medical research is very low. Co-publication networks among the eleven countries are generated to observe the development of cooperation bonds in the region. Applying Salton’s measure of international collaboration strength, an above-average strengthening of scientific collaboration in the Asia–Pacific region can be observed.


Scientific cooperation Country level study Discipline specific publication profiles Asia–Pacific Research Area 



The authors would like to thank the International Bureau of BMBF for commissioning the underlying study. We would also like to thank the Bibliometrics department in the Central Library at Forschungszentrum Jülich for comprehensive technical support and Janet Carter-Sigglow and Hazel Burlet at the Language Services for proofreading this paper.


  1. Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evers, H.-D., Gerke, S., & Schweißhelm, R. (2004). Malaysia, Singapur, Indonesien: Wege zur Wissensgesellschaft. South East Asian Studies Working Paper No. 20. Bonn: Department of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Bonn. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from
  3. Frame, J. D., Narin, F., & Carpenter, M. P. (1977). Distribution of world science. Social Studies of Science, 7(4), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Georghiou, L. (1997) Global cooperation in research (Vol. 27, pp. 611–626). In Paper presented at the conference on the past and future of EU research funding-framework programmes under consideration, June 16–17, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  5. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2007). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Gómez, I., & Méndez, A. (1992). Are peripheral countries profiting from scientific cooperation networks? In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 112–123). Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
  8. Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta, B. M., Munshi, M., & Mishra, P. K. (2004). Regional collaboration in S&T among South Asian countries. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 51(4), 121–132.Google Scholar
  10. Haustein, S., Mittermaier, B., & Tunger, D. (2008). Bibliometric analysis Asia-Pacific Research area commissioned by the International Bureau of the BMBF at DLR. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from
  11. Inonu, E. (2003). The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics, 56(1), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz, J. S., Hicks, D., Narin, F., & Hamilton, K. (1996). International collaboration. Nature, 381(6577), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Networks of international scientific collaboration. In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, & M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology: Proceedings of the international conference on science and technology indicators (pp. 95–111). Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
  16. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez, C., & Moore, T. (2008, October). China goes from strength to strength. Inspec Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Moed, H. F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okubo, Y., Dore, J. C., Ojasoo, T., & Miquel, J. F. (1998). A multivariate analysis of publication trends in the 1980s with special reference to south-east Asia. Scientometrics, 41(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19(1–2), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tunger, D. (2009). Bibliometrische Verfahren und Methoden als Beitrag zur Trendbeobachtung und -erkennung in den Naturwissenschaften. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek, Verlag. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from
  24. Tunger, D., & Haustein, S. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of the Asia-Pacific research area: Issues and results. In Proceedings of ISSI 2009—12th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 2, pp. 996–997).Google Scholar
  25. Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from
  26. Wagner, C. S., Yezril, A., & Hassell, S. (2001). International cooperation in research and development. An update to an inventory to U.S. government spending. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved March 8, 2010 from

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Haustein
    • 1
  • Dirk Tunger
    • 1
  • Gerold Heinrichs
    • 2
  • Gesa Baelz
    • 2
  1. 1.Forschungszentrum Jülich, Central LibraryJülichGermany
  2. 2.International Bureau of the Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations