Scientometrics

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 647–655 | Cite as

Citation accuracy in environmental science journals

Article

Abstract

Citations in five leading environmental science journals were examined for accuracy. 24.41% of the 2,650 citations checked were found to contain errors. The largest category of errors was in the author field. Of the five journals Conservation Biology had the lowest percentage of citations with errors and Climatic Change had the highest. Of the citations with errors that could be checked in Web of Science, 18.18% of the errors caused a search for the cited article to fail. Citations containing electronic links had fewer errors than those without.

Keywords

Citation accuracy Citation errors Environmental journals 

References

  1. Asano, M., et al. (1995). Improvement of the accuracy of references in the Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 42, 370–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth, A. (2004). A checker’s career? Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadus, R. N. (1983). An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CENTER FOR JOURNAL RANKING (2007) Journal Ranking, http://www.journal-ranking.com/ranking (Accessed 06 September 2007).
  5. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.Google Scholar
  6. Goh, D. H., & Ng, P. K. (2006). Link decay in leading information science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58, 15–24.Google Scholar
  7. O’Connor, L. G., & Kristof, C. (2001). Verify your citations: accuracy of reference citations in twelve business and economics journals. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 6, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Place, F., Jr. (1916). Verify your references: a word to medical writers. New York Medical Journal, 104, 697–699.Google Scholar
  9. Todd, P. A., et al. (2007). Citing practices in ecology: can we believe our own words? Oikos, 116, 1599–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. WEB OF SCIENCE. (2009). Web of Science Help. http://images.isiknowledge.com/WOKRS49B3/help/WOS/h_database.html (Accessed 16 June 2010).

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wilson LibraryWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations