Scientometrics

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 541–552 | Cite as

Scientometrics of a pandemic: HIV/AIDS research in South Africa and the World

Article

Abstract

The HIV/AIDS pandemic is of international interest with the 2008 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine having being awarded for the discovery of the virus that causes AIDS. South Africa has a particular interest in the field of HIV/AIDS research as it is the country with the largest number of HIV infections in the world and the issue has created a number of political and scientific debates. This investigation identifies the state of HIV/AIDS related research in South Africa vis-a-vis the rest of the world using evaluative scientometrics in order to inform relevant policy. South Africa is identified as producing an increasing number of HIV/AIDS related publications, making it one of the most prolific fields in the country. The rest of the world appears to have stabilized its research efforts after the development of highly active antiretroviral therapies. The USA is identified as the main producer of HIV/AIDS research while Europe appears to under-emphasise the issue. Comparison of the world’s most prolific universities with those in South Africa identifies that the latter has a fragmented system. A number of policy issues are discussed.

Keywords

Scientometrics HIV/AIDS South Africa Human immunodeficiency virus Science policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank two anonymous referees for constructive comments on an earlier version of the article. The usual caveats apply.

References

  1. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997). Update: Trends in AIDS incidence, United States, 1996. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 46, 861–868.Google Scholar
  2. Chigwedere, P., Seage III, G. R., Gruskin, S., Lee, T.-H., & Essex, M. (2008). Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (JAIDS). (http://www.jaids.com/).
  3. Cohen, J. (2007). HIV/AIDS: AIDSTruth.org Web Site Takes Aim at “Denialists”. Science, 316 (5831), 1554.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. & Enerink, M. (10 Oct 2008). HIV, HPV Researchers honoured, but one Scientist is left out. Science, 322, 174–175.Google Scholar
  5. Dastidar, P. G., & Ramachandran, S. (2005). Engineering research in ocean sector: An international profile. Scientometrics, 65(2), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ESI Science Watch. (2006). Special topics HIV/AIDS. Essential Science Indicators. Thomson accessed April 2008 from http://esi-topics.com/hiv-aids/papers/map.html.
  7. Kim, M. J. (2007). A bibliometrics analysis of the effectiveness of Korea’s biotechnology stimulation plans, with a comparison of four other Asian nations. Scientometrics, 72(3), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Macias-Chapula, A. C., & Mijangos-Nolasco, A. (June 2002). Bibliometric analysis of AIDS literature in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 54(2), 309–317.Google Scholar
  9. Macias-Chapula, A.C., Sotolongo-Aguilar, R.G., Magde, B. & Solorio-Lagunas, J. (1999). Subject Content Analysis of AIDS Literature, as Produced in Latin America and the Caribbean. Scientometrics, 46(3), 563–574.Google Scholar
  10. Mackenzie, S. (2000). Scientific silence: AIDS and African Americans in the medical literature. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1145–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Medecins Sans Frontieres. (2005). Untangling the web of price reductions: A pricing guide for the purchase of ARVs for developing countries. 8th Edn. www.accessmed-msf.org. Accessed September 2008.
  12. Onyacha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (forthcoming). Is HIV/AIDS in Africa distinct? What can we learn from an analysis of the literature? Scientometrics. doi:  10.1007/s11192-009-0418-y. Accessed November 2008 http://www.springerlink.com/ (Online First).
  13. Pouris, A. (2003). South Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years. South African Journal of Science, 99, 425–428.Google Scholar
  14. Pouris, A. (2007a). Is fundamentalism a threat to science: a response from scientometrics. Scientometrics, 71(2), 392–338.Google Scholar
  15. Pouris, A. (2007b). Nano scale research in South Africa: a mapping exercise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pouris, A. (2008). Energy and fuels research in South African universities: A comparative assessment. Open Information Science Journal, 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pouris A. (forthcoming). A scientometric assessment of the Southern Africa Development Community: science in the tip of Africa. Scientometrics. doi:  10.1007/s11192-010-0260-2.
  18. Schubert, T. & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics. doi:  10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2.
  19. Small, H. (1994). A SCI-map case study: building a map of AIDS research. Scientometrics, 30(1), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Yochai, W., & Saechiew, M. (2005). An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study. Scientometrics, 65(3), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UNAIDS. (2007). AIDS epidemic update: December 2007. World Health Organisation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Capacity and Strategic Platforms Grants, National Research FoundationPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Institute for Technological Innovation, University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations