Scientometrics

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 299–315 | Cite as

Regional development and interregional collaboration in the growth of nanotechnology research in China

Article

Abstract

China is becoming a leading nation in terms of its share of the world’s publications in the emerging nanotechnology domain. This paper demonstrates that the international rise of China’s position in nanotechnology has been underwritten by the emergence of a series of regional hubs of nanotechnology R&D activity within the country. We develop a unique database of Chinese nanotechnology articles covering the period 1990 to mid-2006 to identify the regional distribution of nanotechnology research in China. To build this database, a new approach was developed to clean and standardize the geographical allocation of Chinese publication records. We then analyze the data to understand the regional development of nanotechnology research in China over our study period and to map interregional and international research collaboration linkages. We find that the geographical distribution of China’s domestic nanotechnology research is characterized by regional imbalance, with most of the leading regions located in eastern China, including not only Beijing and Shanghai but also a series of other new regional hubs. There is much less development of nanotechnology research in central and western China. Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong are among the leading Chinese regions for international nanotechnology research collaboration. Other Chinese nanotechnology regions are less focused on international collaboration, although they have developed domestic interregional collaborations. Although new regional research hubs have emerged in the nanotechnology domain, the paper notes that their concentration in eastern China reinforces existing imbalances in science and technology capabilities in China, and in turn this may further reinforce the dominant position of eastern China in the commercialization of new technologies such as nanotechnology.

Keywords

Nanotechnology China Regional development Networks Bibliometric analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research received partial support from the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS-ASU) under sponsorship from the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would like to thank Stephen Carley for assistance with Fig. 2.

References

  1. Appelbaum, R. P., & Parker, R. (2008). China’s bid to become a global nanotech leader: advancing nanotechnology through state-led programs and international collaboration. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, C. (2005). Ascent of nanoscience in China. Science, 309(5731), 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Diospatonyi, I., & Zador, E. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Business Week. (2005). The business of nanotech. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_07/b3920001_mz001.htm. Accessed 27 June 2010.
  5. Cientifica. (2009). Nanotechnology takes a deep breath … and prepares to save the world: global nanotechnology funding in 2009. London: Cientifica Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2007). China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology—A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Research Policy, 36(6), 880–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2003). Informetric studies using databases: opportunities and challenges. Scientometrics, 58(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, C., Notten, A., & Rasters, N. (2010). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8.
  9. Joint Economic Committee. (2007). Nanotechnology: the future is coming sooner than you think. Washington, DC: United States Congress.Google Scholar
  10. Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., Rushenberg, R. L., Bowles, C. A., Pecht, M., Johnson, D., et al. (2007a). Comparisons of the structure and infrastructure of Chinese and Indian Science and Technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1609–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007b). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., & Tolles, W. M. (2006). The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin, M.-W., & Zhang, J. (2007). Language trends in nanoscience and technology: the case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics, 70(3), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skar, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university–industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luther, W., Hoffknecht, A., Holtmanspötter, D., & Wagner, V. (2006). Application and market prospects of nanotechnology in products and product groups. In N. Malanowski, T. Heimer, W. Luther, & M. Werner (Eds.), Growth market nanotechnology. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.Google Scholar
  16. Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report (5th ed.). New York: Lux Research Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia V., & Guellec, D. (2008). The OECD REGPAT database: a presentation. STI Working Paper 2008/2, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 534–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoneneck, D. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roco, M. (2001). International strategy for nanotechnology research and development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). From lab to market: strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in China. Journal of Asian Business Management, 8(4), 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun, Y. (2003). Geographic patterns of industrial innovation in China during the 1990s. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(3), 376–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang, L., & Porter, A. L. (2010) Text mining. In D. Guston & J. G. Golson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. Sage Publications, in press.Google Scholar
  26. Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2008). International collaboration, knowledge moderation, and the growth of China’s nanoscience and nanotechnology. Working paper. http://www.spp.gatech.edu/faculty/WOPRpapers/Tang.WOPR.pdf.
  27. Tang, L., & Walsh, J. (2010). Bibliometric fingerprints: name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps. Scientometrics, 84(3), 763–794. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0196-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uldrich, J., & Newberry, D. (2003). The next big thing is really small: how nanotechnology will change the future of your business. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Y., Wu, Y. S., Pan, Y. T., Ma, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics, 62(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Porter, A. L. (2008). Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(6), 981–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations