Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management
- 877 Downloads
Assessing the quality of the knowledge produced by business and management academics is increasingly being metricated. Moreover, emphasis is being placed on the impact of the research rather than simply where it is published. The main metric for impact is the number of citations a paper receives. Traditionally this data has come from the ISI Web of Science but research has shown that this has poor coverage in the social sciences. A newer and different source for citations is Google Scholar. In this paper we compare the two on a dataset of over 4,600 publications from three UK Business Schools. The results show that Web of Science is indeed poor in the area of management and that Google Scholar, whilst somewhat unreliable, has a much better coverage. The conclusion is that Web of Science should not be used for measuring research impact in management.
KeywordsCitations Google Scholar Research impact Web of Science
- Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(7). doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7.
- Evidence Ltd. (2004). Bibliometric profiles for selected units of assessment. Leeds: Evidence Ltd.Google Scholar
- HEFCE. (2008a). Counting what is measured or measuring what counts (no. 2008/14). HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/consult/outcomes/ref.asp.
- HEFCE. (2008b). Survey of institutions interested in participating in the pilot of the bibliometrics indicator. HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/consult/outcomes/ref.asp.
- Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537–1547.Google Scholar
- Mahdi, S., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2008). Citation counts: Are they good predictors of RAE scores? London: AIM Research.Google Scholar
- Mingers, J. (2008). Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index. Journal of Operational Research Society, 60(8), 1143–1153.Google Scholar
- Moed, H., & Visser, M. (2008). Appraisal of citation data sources. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University.Google Scholar
- Moed, H., Visser, M., & Buter, R. (2008). Development of bibliometric indicators of research quality. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University: Leiden.Google Scholar
- Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Bibliometric databases—scoping project. Louborough: Department of Information Science, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
- Tenopir, C. (2004). Online scholarly journals: How many? Library Journal, 129(2), 32.Google Scholar
- Tenopir, C. (2005). Google in the academic library. Library Journal, 130(2), 32.Google Scholar
- van Raan, A. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technology Assessment Theory and Practice, 1(12), 20–29.Google Scholar