Women in STEM networks: who seeks advice and support from women scientists?
- 426 Downloads
Supporting and advancing women’s science careers continues to be of interest to researchers, scientists, science funders, and universities. Similarly, professional advice and support networks are important to understanding the advancement of scientific careers. This research aims to marry these two lines of research to investigate and compare the ways in which men and women scientists seek advice and support from women in their networks. Using a sample of academic scientists in nonmedical biology, chemistry, computer science, earth and atmospheric sciences, electrical engineering, and physics we assess the extent to which women and men scientists seek advice and support from women in their networks. We find that field of science is the primary predictor for the presence of women in scientists’ advice and support networks. We also find that citizenship, rank, age, and friendship are significantly related to the proportion of women in women’s networks, but are not consistently significantly related to the proportion of women in men’s networks. We conclude with a discussion of the findings and the distinctions between men and women scientists’ advice and support networks.
KeywordsWomen Networks Advice Support Field of science
- Browne, K. R. (2004). Women in the workplace: Evolutionary perspectives and public policy. In C. Crawford & C. Salmon (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology, public policy, and personal decisions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Curtin, J. M., Blake, G., & Cassagnau, C. (1997). The climate for women graduate students in physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3, 95–117.Google Scholar
- Emmett, A. (1992). A woman’s institute of technology. Technology Review, 16–18.Google Scholar
- Epstein, C. F. (1970). Woman’s place: Options and limits in professional careers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Fox-Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Horning, B. (1993). The controversial career of evelyn fox keller. Technology Review, 58–68.Google Scholar
- Konrad, A. M. (1986). The impact of workgroup composition on social integration and evaluation. PhD Dissertation, Claremont University, Claremont, CA.Google Scholar
- Lee, S. (2004). Foreign-born scientists in the United States: Do they perform differently than native-born scientists? PhD Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Science. (2003). BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2004). Division of science resources statistics. Doctoral Scientists and Engineers: 2001 Profile Tables NSF 04-312.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and engineering doctorate award. Survey of Earned Doctorates 1997–2006. Washington DC.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2009). ADVANCE: Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers. Retrieved January 15, 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5383.
- Pepe, A., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2009). Collaboration in sensor network research: An in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns. Scientometrics, Published online 31 December 2009. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0147-2.
- Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. K., & Pruitt, B. H. (2002). Beyond work-family balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rosenfeld, R. (1984). Academic career mobility for psychologists. In V. B. Haas & C. C. Perrucci (Eds.), Women in scientific and engineering professions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Sabharwal, M. (2008). Examining the job satisfaction patterns of foreign-born scientists and engineers in the academy: a comparison with U.S. born faculty. Paper presented at the Thirtieth Annual APPAM Research Conference.Google Scholar
- Seymour, E. (1995). The Loss of women from science, mathematics and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 34, 110–131.Google Scholar
- Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Tierney, W. G., Rhoads, R.A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process (pp. 63–72). ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6, Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, H. (1989). Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In C. M. S. Tabboni (Ed.), L’Opera di R. K. Merton e la Sociologia Contemporeana. Genoa: Edizioni Culturali Internationali Genova.Google Scholar