The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Taking the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics as an example, this study examines whether Thomson Reuters, for the Journal Citation Reports, correctly calculates the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of a journal that publishes several versions of a manuscript within a two-stage publication process. The results of this study show that the JIF of the journal is not overestimated through the two-stage publication process.
KeywordsJournal Impact Factor Open access Peer review
- Amin, M., & Mabe, M. A. (2003). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Medicina-Buenos Aires, 63(4), 347–354.Google Scholar
- Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1995). The sweet and sour of journal citation rates. On a source of error in computing impact factors. The Chemical Intelligencer, 31–32.Google Scholar
- Koop, T., & Pöschl, U. (2006). Systems: an open, two-stage peer-review journal. The editors of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics explain their journal’s approach. Retrieved 26 June 2006, from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html.
- Kumar, V., Upadhyay, S., & Medhi, B. (2009). Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: Its use and misuse. Singapore Medical Journal, 50(8), 752–755.Google Scholar
- Kurtz, M., & Brody, T. (2006). The impact loss to authors and readers. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 45–54). Oxford: Chandos Publication.Google Scholar
- McVeigh, M. E. (2010). Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1996). A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society—inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics, 37(1), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar