Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics
- 298 Downloads
Many studies have found that collaborative research is, in general, more highly cited than non-collaborative research. This paper describes an investigation into the extent to which the association between high citation and collaboration for Economics articles published in 2000 varies from region to region and depends on the choice of indicator of citation level. Using data from the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) for 18 countries, 17 American states and four indicators of citation level the citation levels of the collaborative articles are compared with the citation levels of the non-collaborative articles. The main findings are that: (a) for every country and every indicator the mean citation level of the collaborative articles was at least as high as that for the non-collaborative articles, but for five US states and for at least one other indicator the citation level of collaborative articles was lower than that of non-collaborative articles, and (b) the extent to which collaborative articles were more highly cited varied considerably from country to country, from state to state, and from indicator to indicator. This indicates the importance of using multiple indicators when investigating citation advantage since the choice of indicator can change the results.
KeywordsCitation analysis Research collaboration
The research is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (Grant number PTA-026-27-2228).
- Crase, D., & Rosato, F. D. (1992). Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dancing, 63(7), 28–31.Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W. (2002). Co-authorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980.1998). A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.Google Scholar
- HEFCE. (2009). Interim report of the REF bibliometrics pilot exercise (http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/rdreports/2009/rd13_09/rd13_09.doc. Accessed 1st Feb 2010.
- Leimu, R. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? Bioscience, 55, 438–443.Google Scholar
- Levitt, J. M. & Thewall, M. (2007). Two new indicators derived from the h-index for comparing citation impact: Hirsch frequencies and the normalised hirsch index. Proceedings of the 11th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics, pp. 874–875.Google Scholar
- Lewison, G. (2007). Counting citations: Fractionation of addresses and “world-scale”, a new scalar. Proceedings of the 11th conference of the international society for scientometrics and infometrics, pp. 880–881.Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Uthman, O. A. (2008). HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: A bibliometric analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 8(3). doi:10.1186/1471-2334-8-19.