, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 863–885 | Cite as

Medical research in South Africa: a scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership



Being a scientifically active country in Africa, South Africa has made significant strides in the production of scientific publications. Medicine is one branch of science that has achieved a remarkable position in this regard. Extracting and analyzing medical publications for three decades and at regular intervals (1975–2005) from the SCI database, this paper pioneers an attempt to find out whether the reported pace of growth in the production of scientific papers in medicine is an effect of partnerships that scholars have with their counterparts within the organization, within the country, or with those in other countries. This paper also presents the unique patterns of scientific research in medicine, taking into account factors such as the count and fractional count of papers, citations, trends of growth, sectoral participation, partners, and publication outlets, and seeks to provide new insights into the directions medical science is taking in South Africa today.


Medicine Partnership Productivity Scientometric analysis South Africa 


  1. Anuradha, K. T., & Urs, S. R. (2007). Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: A correspondence analysis. Scientometrics, 71, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration, part i: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration, part ii: Scientific coauthorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics, 1, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bliziotis, I. A., Paraschakis, K., Vergidis, P. I., Karavasiou, A. I., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of infectious diseases. BMC Infectious Diseases, 5, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities: An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 61, 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81, 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2003), Research and technology collaboration and linkages: implications from two U.S. case studies. Georgia Institute of Technology. Accessed April 24, 2007, from,
  10. Brink, A. (2009). The development of cardiology in South Africa. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 20, 5–6.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, T.-J., Chen, Y.-C., Hwang, S.-J., & Chou, L.-F. (2007). International collaboration of clinical medicine research in Taiwan, 1990–2004: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Chinese Medical Association, 70, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DST (Department of Science and Technology) (2002), South Africa’s National Research and Development Strategy. Pretoria: Department of Science and Technology. Accessed August 31, 2007, from
  13. Falagas, M. E., Papastamataki, P. A., & Bliziotis, I. A. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003). BMC Infectious Diseases, 6, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farahat, H. (2002). Authorship patterns in agricultural sciences in Egypt. Scientometrics, 55, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glover, S. W., & Bowen, S. L. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of research published in tropical medicine and international health 1996–2003. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 9, 1327–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & Derouen, K., Jr. (2003). Science from the periphery: collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 37, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habib, A., & Morrow, S. (2006). Research, research productivity and the state in South Africa. Transformation, 62, 9–29.Google Scholar
  18. Hajra, K. B., & Sen, P. (2005). Aging in citation networks. Physica A, 346, 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellsten, I., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., & Ausloos, M. (2007). Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility? Scientometrics, 72, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingwersen, P., & Jacobs, D. (2004). South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000. Scientometrics, 59, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs, D., & Ingwersen, P. (2000). A bibliometric study of the publication patterns in the sciences of South African scholars 1981–96. Scientometrics, 47, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeenah, M., & Pouris, A. (2008). South African research in the context of Africa and globally. South African Journal of Science, 104, 351–354.Google Scholar
  23. Kaplan, D. (2004). South Africa’s national research and development strategy: A review. Science, Technology and Society, 9, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kundra, R., & Kretschmer, H. (1999). A new model of scientific collaboration: Part 2, collaboration patterns in Indian medicine. Scientometrics, 46, 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma, N., & Guan, J. (2005). An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 65, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayhew, S. H., Doherty, J., & Pitayarangsarit, S. (2008). Developing health systems research capacities through north-south partnership: An evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russel, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2002). Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navarro, A., & Martin, M. (2004). Scientific production and international collaboration in occupational health, 1992–2001. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 30, 223–233.Google Scholar
  31. Nordkvelle, Y. (1990). The academic boycott of South Africa debate: Science and social practice. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schuber, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009), Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany, Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2.
  34. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uthman, O. A., & Uthman, M. B. (2007). Geography of Africa biomedical publications: An analysis of 1996–2005 PubMed papers. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, C. S., & Markusova, V. A. (2004). Changes in the scientific output of Russia from 1980 to 2000, as reflected in the science citation index, in relation to national politico-economic changes. Scientometrics, 59, 345–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology ProgrammeHoward Campus, University of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations