Evidence base, quantitation and collaboration: three novel indices for bibliometric content analysis
- 277 Downloads
Bibliometric measurements, though controversial, are useful in providing measures of research performance in a climate of research competition and marketisation. Numerous bibliometric studies have been performed which rely on traditional indices (such as the journal impact factor and citation index) and provide little descriptive data regarding the actual characteristics of research. The purpose of this study was two-fold, to develop three novel bibliometric indices, designed to describe the characteristics of research (relating to evidence base, quantitation and collaboration), and to apply them in a cross-sectional audit of original research articles published in Australian professional association journals across medicine, nursing and allied health in 2007. Results revealed considerable variation in bibliometric indices across these journals. There were emerging clusters of journals that published collaborative research using higher levels of evidence and reported quantitative data, with others featuring articles using lower levels of evidence, fewer quantitative data and less collaboration among authors.
KeywordsBibliometrics Medicine Nursing health occupations Allied health occupations Professional practice
- Allison, G., Cross, W., Galea, M., Herbert, R., Hodges, P., Grimmer, K., et al. (2002). More than skin deep. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 48(2), 69–70.Google Scholar
- Andres Iglesias, J. C., Andres Rodriguez, N. F., & Fornos Perez, J. A. (2007). Community pharmacy-based research in Spain (1995–2005): A bibliometric study. Pharmacy Practice, 5(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
- Australian Research Council. (2008). Research Journal Ranking Review List. Canberra Airport ACT: Australian Research Council.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, J., & Whitworth, J. A. (2001). A half century of Australian health and medical research. Medical Journal of Australia, 174(11), 29–32.Google Scholar
- Cleary, M., Walter, G., & Hunt, G. (2006). The quest to fund research: Playing research lotto. Australasian Psychiatry, 14(3), 323–326.Google Scholar
- Coleman, C. I., Schlesselmann, L., & White, C. M. (2007). Journal publications by pharmacy practice faculty evaluated by institution and region of the United States. Pharmacy Practice, 5(4), 151–156.Google Scholar
- Ebrall, P. (2009). The Chiropractic Journal of Australia: A valuable repository of our profession’s history. Chiropractic Journal of Australia, 39(1), 34–42.Google Scholar
- Hickie, I. B., Christensen, H., Davenport, T. A., & Luscombe, G. M. (2005). Can we track the impact of Australian mental health research? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 591–599.Google Scholar
- ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports. (2009). Viewed November 6, 2009, http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?RQ=LIST_SUMMARY_JOURNAL&cursor=1.
- Levsky, M. E., Rosin, A., Coon, T., Enslow, W. L., & Miller, M. A. (2007). A descriptive analysis of authorship within medical journals 1995–2005. Southern Medical Journal, 100(4), 371–375.Google Scholar
- McLean, R., Mendis, K., Harris, B., & Canalese, J. (2007). Retrospective bibliometric review of rural health research: Australia’s contribution and other trends. Rural and Remote Health, 7, 767.Google Scholar
- Mendis, K. (2007). Health informatics research in Australia: Retrospective analysis using PubMed. Informatics in Primary Care, 15(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
- Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Sherrington, C., & Maher, C. G. (2002). Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 48, 43–49.Google Scholar
- NHMRC. (2008). NHMRC Evidence Hierarchy: Designations of ‘levels of evidence’ according to type of research question. In Additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines, Stage 2 Consultation (Early 2008–end June 2009). National Health and Medical Research Council. Pg6. Viewed November 6, 2009, http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/_files/Stage%202%20Consultation%20Levels%20and%20Grades.pdf.
- Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed., pp. 594–595). Pearson Education/Pearson Prentice Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Richter, R. R., Schlomer, S. L., Krieger, M. M., & Siler, W. L. (2008). Journal publication productivity in academic physical therapy programs in the United States and Puerto Rico from 1998 to 2002. Physical Therapy, 88(3), 376–386.Google Scholar
- Ward, A. M., Lopez, D. G., & Kamien, M. (2000). General practice research in Australia 1980–1999. Medical Journal of Australia, 173(11), 608–611.Google Scholar
- Wilkes, L., Borbasi, S., Hawes, C., Stewart, M., & May, D. (2002). Measuring the outputs of nursing research and development in Australia: The researchers. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(4), 15–20.Google Scholar