Scientometrics

, 81:779 | Cite as

A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index

Article

Abstract

The h-index is becoming a reference tool for career assessment and it is starting to be considered by some agencies and institutions in promotion, allocation, and funding decisions. In areas where h indices tend to be low, individuals with different research accomplishments may end up with the same h. This paper proposes a multidimensional extension of the h index in which the conventional h is only the first component. Additional components of the multidimensional index are obtained by computing the h-index for the subset of papers not considered in the immediately preceding component. Computation of the multidimensional index for 204 faculty members in Departments of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain shows that individuals with the same h can indeed be distinguished by their values in the remaining components, and that the strength of the correlation of the second and third components of the multidimensional index with alternative bibliometric indicators is similar to that of the first component (i.e., the original h).

References

  1. Anderson, T. R., Hankin, R. K. S., Killworth, P. D. (2008), Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76: 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., Martinez, A. S. (2006), Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68: 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65: 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrell, Q. L. (2007), Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data. Scientometrics, 73: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costas, R., Bordons, M. (2008), Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 77: 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egghe, L. (2006a), An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1): 8.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Egghe, L. (2006b), Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. García-Pérez, M. A. (2009), The Hirsch h index in a non-mainstream area: Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain. Spanish Journal of Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 102: 16569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirsch, J. E. (2007), Does the h index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 104: 19193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iglesias, J. E., Pecharromán, C. (2007), Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73: 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Imperial, J., Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2007), Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71: 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, C. D., Jennions, M. D. (2006), The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21: 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kelly, C. D., Jennions, M. D. (2007), H-index: Age and sex make it unreliable. Nature, 449: 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosmulski, M. (2006), A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3): 4.Google Scholar
  16. Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., Lautrup, B. E. (2007), Measures for measures. Nature, 444: 1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., Lautrup, B. E. (2008), A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics, 76: 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang, L. (2006), h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69: 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Raan, A. F. J. (2006), Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67: 491.Google Scholar
  20. RODRÍGUEZ NAVARRO, A., IMPERIAL RÓDENAS, J. (2007), Índice h. Guía Para la Evaluación de la Investigación Española en Ciencia y Tecnología Utilizando el Índice h. Madrid: Consejería de Educación de la Comunidad de Madrid. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.madrimasd.org /informacionidi/biblioteca/publicacion/doc/33_indiceh.zip.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, R. (2008), Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2: 1.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruane, F., Tol, R. S. J. (2008), Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 75: 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saad, G. (2006), Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schreiber, M. (2007), A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists. Annalen der Physik, 16: 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schubert, A. (2009), Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, in press.Google Scholar
  26. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., Manolopoulos, Y. (2007), Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72: 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taber, D. F. (2005), Quantifying publication impact. Science, 309: 2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vinkler, P. (2007), Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33: 481.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Wendl, M. C. (2007), H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449: 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhivotovsky, L. A., Krutovsky, K. V. (2008), Self-citation can inflate h-index. Scientometrics, 77: 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Metodología, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations