Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 79, Issue 2, pp 365–375 | Cite as

Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application

  • Henry Small
  • Phineas Upham
Article

Abstract

A case study of an emerging research area is presented dealing with the creation of organic thin film transistors, a subtopic within the general area called “plastic electronics.” The purpose of this case study is to determine the structural properties of the citation network that may be characteristic of the emergence, development, and application or demise of a research area. Research on organic thin film transistors is highly interdisciplinary, involving journals and research groups from physics, chemistry, materials science, and engineering. There is a clear path to industrial applications if certain technical problems can be overcome. Despite the applied nature and potential for patentable inventions, scholarly publications from both academia and industry have continued at a rapid pace through 2007. The question is whether the bibliometric indicators point to a decline in this area due to imminent commercialization or to insurmountable technical problems with these materials.

Keywords

Minimal Span Tree Pentacene Citation Network Research Front Rubrene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, C. (2006), CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3): 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins, G. P. (2004), Next stretch for plastic electronics. Scientific American, 291: 74v81.Google Scholar
  3. Crane, D. (1972), Invisible Colleges Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., Istomin, V. S. (2003), Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., Asnake, B. (2003), Timeline visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(5): 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Murray, F. S. (2005), Do intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? NBER Academic Science and Entrepreneurship Conference.Google Scholar
  8. Small, H. (1977), A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: a longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7: 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Small, H. (1986), The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 97–110.Google Scholar
  10. Small, H. (2006), Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3): 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sullivan, D., White, D. H. Barboni, E. J. (1977), Co-citation analyses of science: an evaluation. Social Studies of Science, 7(2): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Upham, P., Small, H. (2007), Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. To be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thomson ReutersPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations