Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study
The investigators studied author research impact using the number of citers per publication an author’s research has been able to attract, as opposed to the more traditional measure of citations. A focus on citers provides a complementary measure of an author’s reach or influence in a field, whereas citations, although possibly numerous, may not reflect this reach, particularly if many citations are received from a small number of citers. In this exploratory study, Web of Science was used to tally citer and citation-based counts for 25 highly cited researchers in information studies in the United States and 26 highly cited researchers from the United Kingdom. Outcomes of the tallies based on several measures, including an introduced ch-index, were used to determine whether differences arise in author rankings when using citer-based versus citation-based counts. The findings indicate a strong correlation between some citation and citer-based measures, but not with others. The findings of the study have implications for the way authors’ research impact may be assessed.
KeywordsCiter analysis Citation analysis Research impact
- Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 197–213). Medford, NJ: Information Today.Google Scholar
- Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 145–157.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1962). Can citation indexing be automated? Essays of an Information Scientist, 1, 84–90.Google Scholar
- MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342–349.Google Scholar
- Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83–106.Google Scholar
- Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 431–435.Google Scholar
- Wang, W., Mokhtar, M., & Macaulay, L. (2008). C-index: Trust depth, trust breadth, and a collective trust measurement. In WebScience’08. Retrieved March 24, 2009 from http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/dem/workshops/webscience08/papers/websci08-wang.pdf.
- Zhao, D. Z. (2006). Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1578–1591.Google Scholar