, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 481–503 | Cite as

South–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)

  • Nelius BoshoffEmail author


This study investigates South–South collaboration in research, and specifically collaboration among the 15 countries of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) as well as between the SADC and the rest of Africa. It was found that only 3% of SADC papers during 2005–2008 were jointly authored by researchers from two or more SADC countries (intra-regional collaboration), and only 5% of SADC papers were jointly authored with researchers from African countries outside the SADC (continental collaboration). In contrast, 47% of SADC papers were co-authored with scientists from high-income countries. The few instances of intra-regional and continental collaboration in the SADC are largely the product of North–South collaboration. Authors from high-income countries are included in 60% of intra-regional co-authored papers and in 59% of continental co-authored papers. Moreover, between 2005 and 2008, South Africa produced 81% of all SADC papers and 78% of all intra-regional co-authored papers. This implies that there is a highly unbalanced and unequal partnership that can best be described as a variant of North–South collaboration with the scientific giant in the South taking on the role of the ‘political North’. As a consequence, guidelines for successful North–South collaborations should be extended to include South–South collaborations that comprise highly unequal partners, as is the case between South Africa and the other SADC countries.


South–South collaboration North–South collaboration Research collaboration Co-authorship Southern African Development Community (SADC) South Africa Regional integration 

Supplementary material

11192_2009_120_MOESM1_ESM.doc (260 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 260 kb)


  1. Arunachalam, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2008). South-South cooperation: The case of Indo-Chinese collaboration in scientific research. Current Science, 95(3), 311–313.Google Scholar
  2. Arvantis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2000). Science in Africa: A bibliometric panorama using PASCAL database. Scientometrics, 47(3), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binka, F. (2005). North-South research collaborations: A move towards a true partnership? Tropical Medicine and International Health, 10(3), 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boshoff, N. (2009). Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics, 81(2), 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costello, C., & Zumla, A. (2000). Moving to research partnerships in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 321(7264), 827–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Council on Higher Education (CHE). (2009). Postgraduate studies in South Africa: A statistical profile. Higher Education Monitor No 7. Pretoria, South Africa: CHE.Google Scholar
  7. Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Ahimbisibwe, J., Van Moll, R., & Koedam, N. (2003). Neo-colonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing. Scientometrics, 56(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahoun, A. M. (1999). Black Africa in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 46(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Science and Technology (DST). (2007). SADC ministers sign protocol to improve science and technology cooperation. Press release by the South African Department of Science and Technology, Pretoria, South Africa, 31 July, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Gaillard, J. F. (1994). North-South research partnerships: Is collaboration possible between unequal partners? Knowledge and Policy, 7(2), 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibb, R. (2007). Regional integration in post-apartheid Southern Africa. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(4), 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Green, M. (2008). A force for peace in the Middle East. Science, 321, 1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan, M. A. H. (2000). Challenges, opportunities and strategies in South-South cooperation. Cooperation South, 1, 29–42. Publication by the Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC), United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, D., & Pichappan, P. (2006). Research collaboration and scientific productivity among the research universities in South Africa. International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET meeting. 10–12 May 2006, Nancy.Google Scholar
  16. Jeenah, M., & Pouris, A. (2008). South African research in the context of Africa and globally. South African Journal of Science, 104, 351–354.Google Scholar
  17. Jentsch, B., & Pilley, C. (2003). Research relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the ugly sisters? Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1957–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kane, O. (2000). Priority sectors and actions for science and technology cooperation. Cooperation South, 1, 66–73. Publication by the Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC), United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, K. W. (2006). Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics, 66(2), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melon, C. C., Ray, M., Chakkalackal, C., Li, M., Li, L., Madkour, M. A., et al. (2009). A survey of South-North health biotech collaboration. Nature Biotechnology, 27(3), 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mouton, J. (2008). Africa’s science decline: The challenge of building scientific institutions. Harvard International Review, 30(3), 46–51.Google Scholar
  27. Narváez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., & Gaillard, J. (2002). Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Narváez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., & Velho, L. (1999). Scientific collaboration of the Mercosur countries as an indicator of Latin American regional activity. Research Evaluation, 8(2), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2006). Africa’s Science and Technology Consolidated Plan of Action. Office of Science and Technology of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  30. Ogodo, O. (2008). Collaboration ‘can reignite Zimbabwean science’. Science and Development Network, 29 September 2008. Available at
  31. Ogodo, O. (2009). Africans ‘losing out’ in North-South collaborations. Science and Development Network, 14 October 2008. Available at
  32. Ohiorhenuan, J. F. E., & Rath, A. (2000). The history and urgency of South-South cooperation in science and technology. Cooperation South, 1, 6–28. Publication by the Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC), United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialized countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0074-2.
  35. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80(2), 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Southern African Development Community (SADC). (2001). Treaty of the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Consolidated text of the SADC treaty, as amended on 14 August 2001.Google Scholar
  37. Southern African Development Community (SADC). (2003). Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan. SADC, Gaborone, Botswana.Google Scholar
  38. The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2001). Strategic framework document, formally adopted in October 2001, in Abuja, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  39. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Velho, L. (2002). North-South collaboration and systems of innovation. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 1(3), 171–181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Science and Technology (CREST)Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations