, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 639–648 | Cite as

Combination of Eigenfactor TM and h-index to evaluate scientific journals

  • Chun-Yang Yin
  • Mohd Jindra Aris
  • Xi Chen


The h-index and Eigenfactor TM values of top and specialized scientific/engineering journals are tabulated and combined to provide a simple graphical representation of the journals. The information may be tailored to specific uses by respective stakeholders to aid decision making processes with regards to scholarly research and scientific journal publications.


Journal status EigenfactorTM score h-index Journal impact factor 



Mathematics Subject Classification


JEL Classification



  1. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, 68, 314–316.Google Scholar
  2. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2009). Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: A comparison of new metrics with the journal impact factor. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 10, 1471–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69, 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fersht, A. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact factor and Eigenfactor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 106(17), 6883–6884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glanzel, W. (2006). On the h-index—A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). A bibliometric profile of top-scientists: A case study in chemical engineering. Scientometrics, 29(1), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Taber, D. F. (2005). Quantifying publication impact. Science, 309, 2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502.Google Scholar
  14. Yu, G., & Wang, L. (2007). The self-cited rate of scientific journals and the manipulation of their impact factors. Scientometrics, 73(3), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah Alam, SelangorMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations