The h-index has captured the imagination of scientometricians and bibliometricians to such an extent that one can now divide the history of the subject virtually into a pre-Hirsch and a post-Hirsch period. Beyond its academic value, it is now used as a tool for research assessment of individuals, research faculties and institutions and even for comparing performance of journals and countries. Since its introduction, many Hirsch-type variants have been proposed to overcome perceived limitations of the original index. In this paper, using ideas from mathematical modeling, another mock h-index is proposed which may complement the h-index and give it better resolving power.
KeywordsBibliometrics h-index Mock h-index Corrected quality ratio
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Der h-index-das Mass aller Dinge? Der aktuelle Stand der h-Index-Forschung. Forschung uber Forschung, 2, 38–43.Google Scholar
- García-Pérez, M. A. (2009), A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-2290-1.
- Glänzel, W. (2008), On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. OR 0801, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102: 16569–16572.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104: 19193–19198.Google Scholar
- Lindsey, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in social science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Prathap, G. (2006). Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions’ scientific research output. Current Science, 91(11), 10.Google Scholar
- White, H. D., & Mccain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.Google Scholar