Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output

  • 256 Accesses

  • 27 Citations

Abstract

Based on data from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and using scientometric methods, we conducted a systematic analysis of Chinese regional contributions and international collaboration in terms of scientific publications, publication activity, and citation impact. We found that regional contributions are highly skewed. The top positions measured by number of publications or citations, share of publications or citations are taken by almost the same set of regions. But this is not the case when indicators for relative citation impact are used. Comparison between regional scientific output and R&D expenditure shows that Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the two indicators is rather low among the leading publication regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1985), Scientometric Indicators. A 32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore — Philadelphia 1985.

  2. Frame, J. D. (1977), Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143–148.

  3. Frietsch, R., Tang, L., Hinze, S. (2007), Bibliometric data study: Assessing the current ranking of the People’s Republic of China in a set of research fields. Report to the European Commission. Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe (Germany).

  4. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2003), A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for bibliometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56: 357–367.

  5. Glänzel, W., Leta, J., Thijs, B. (2006), Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1): 67–86.

  6. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B. (2007), National Research Profiles in the Changing Europe (1983–2003). An exploratory study on sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 70(2): 267–275.

  7. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Meyer, M. (2008), ’Triad’ or ‘Tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world, Scientometrics, 74(1): 59–76.

  8. Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schubert, A., Debackere, K. (2009), Subfield-specific normalised relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance, Scientometrics, 78(1): 165–188.

  9. Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. (2007), Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system, D. Torres-Salinas & H. Moed (Eds), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol. 1,, CSIC, Madrid, 21–25 June 2007, pp. 499–507.

  10. Moed, H. F., de Bruin, R. E., van Leeuwen, Th. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicatiors and first applications. Scientometrics, 33: 381–442.

  11. MOST (2007), R&D Expenditure. Available at: http://www.sts.org.cn/sjkl/kjtjdt/data2007/2007-1.htmNSF, Asia’s Rising Science and Technology Strength, Comparative Indicators for Asia, the European Union, and the United States.

  12. REIST-2 (1997), The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1997. EUR 17639. European Commission, Brussels.

  13. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., Braun, T. (1989), World flash on basic research: Scientometric datafiles. A Comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 16(1–6): 3–478.

  14. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science, Research Policy, 35(1): 83–104.

  15. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2008), China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006, Chinese Science Bulletin, forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Wolfgang Glänzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, P., Thijs, B. & Glänzel, W. Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics 81, 839 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2255-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • International Collaboration
  • Citation Rate
  • Citation Impact
  • Science Citation Index Expand
  • Publication Profile