Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa
- 737 Downloads
The study examines aspects of both neo-colonial ties and neo-colonial science in research papers produced by Central African countries. The primary focus is on the extent and pattern of neo-colonial ties and other foreign participation in the co-authorship of Central African research papers. The analysis revealed that 80% of Central Africa’s research papers are produced in collaboration with a partner from outside the region. Moreover, 46% of papers are produced in collaboration with European countries as the only partner, and 35% in collaboration with past colonial rulers. The top collaborating countries are France (32%), the USA (14%), and the UK and Germany (both 12%). Foreign powers also facilitate the production of regionally and continentally co-authored papers in Central Africa, where European countries participate in 77% of regionally co-authored papers.
The practice of neo-colonial science, on the other hand, features in a survey of reprint authors of Cameroonian papers. The survey investigated specific contributions made by Cameroon coauthors to the research processes underlying a paper. Cameroonian researchers contribute intellectually and conceptually to the production of research papers, irrespective of whether the collaboration involves partners from past colonial or non-colonial countries. Their most frequent role in collaborative research with foreign researchers remains the conduct of fieldwork.
KeywordsResearch Collaboration Gross National Product Colonial Power Research Capacity Strengthen Foreign Participation
- Langer, A., Díaz-Olavarrieta, C., Berdichevsky, K., Villar, J. (2004), Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(10): 802–803.Google Scholar
- Lansang, M. A., Dennis, R. (2004), Building capacity in health research in the developing world, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(10): 764–770.Google Scholar
- Mouton, J. (2008), Regional Report on Sub-Saharan Africa, A meta-review produced for the Symposium on Comparative Analysis of National Research Systems, 16–18 January 2008, UNESCO, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Nagtegaal, L. W., De Bruin, R. E. (1994), The French connection and other neo-colonial patterns in the global network of science, Research Evaluation, 4(2): 119–127.Google Scholar
- NEPAD (2006), Africa’s Science and Technology Consolidated Plan of Action, Office of Science and Technology of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Pouris, A., Pouris, A. (2007), The state of science and technology in Africa: A scientometric assessment, Proceeding of ISSI, 619–630.Google Scholar
- Shrum, W., Shenhav, Y. (1995), Science and technology in less developed countries. In: S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, T. Pinch (Eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (revised edition), Sage Publications, Chapter 7, pp. 627–651.Google Scholar