, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 549–565 | Cite as

Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates

  • Juan Miguel CampanarioEmail author


I review and discuss instances in which 19 future Nobel Laureates encountered resistance on the part of the scientific community towards their discoveries, and instances in which 24 future Nobel Laureates encountered resistance on the part of scientific journal editors or referees to manuscripts that dealt with discoveries that later would earn them the Nobel Prize.


Nobel Prize Scientific Discovery Physical Review Letter Nobel Laureate Current Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous (1948), Arne Wilhelm Kaurin Tiselius — Biography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  2. Anonymous (1986), Press Release: The 1986 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, (The Nobel Foundation).
  3. Anonymous (1988), Untitled, Nature, 335: 753.Google Scholar
  4. Ayala, F. J. (1994), On the scientific methods, its practice and pitfalls, History and Philosophy of Life Sciences, 16: 205–240.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1961), Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery, Science, 134: 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beadle, G. W. (1974), Recollections, Annual Review of Biochemistry, 43: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benacerraff, B. (1991), When all is said and done, Annual Review of Immunology, 9: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H. (1986), Scanning Tunneling Microscopy — From Birth to Adolescence (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  9. Blumberg, B. B. (1977), Australia antigen and the biology of Hepatitis B, Science, 197: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyer, P. D. (1997), Energy, Life and ATP (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  11. Buchanan, M. (1996), Physics award acclaims superfluid helium, Nature, 383: 562.Google Scholar
  12. Burnet, M. (1968), Changing Patterns. An Atypical Autobiography, William Heinemann, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  13. Campanario, J. M. (1993), Consolation for the scientist: Sometimes it is hard to publish papers that are later highly cited, Social Studies of Science, 23: 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campanario, J. M. (1995), Commentary on influential books and journal articles initially rejected because of negative referees evaluations, Science Communication, 16: 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campanario, J. M. (1996), Have referees rejected some of the most-cited papers of all times?, Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 47: 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campanario, J. M. (2002), The parallelism between scientists and students resistance to new scientific ideas, International Journal of Science Education, 24: 1095–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campanario, J. M., Acedo, E. (2007), Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 734–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Capecchi, M. R. (2001), Generating mice with targeted mutations, Nature Medicine, 7: 1086–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cech, T. R. (1989), Self-splicing and Enzymatic Activity of an Intervening Sequence RNA from Tetrahymena (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  20. Colman, A. M. (1982), Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 205–206.Google Scholar
  21. Cormack, A. M. (1979), Early Two-dimensional Deconstruction and Recent Topics Stemming from it (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  22. Doherty, P. C. (1983), Citation Classics commentary on Transplant. Rev. 29: 89–124, 1976 (available in Scholar
  23. Doherty, P. C. (1996), Autobiography, Nobel Foundation).
  24. Ernst, R. R. (1983), Citation Classics commentary on Rev. Sci.Instr., 37: 93–102, 1966 (available in Scholar
  25. Ernst, R. R. (1991), Autobiography, Nobel Foundation).
  26. Fenner, F., Cory, S. (1997), The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, (The Nobel Foundation).
  27. Fleming, A. (1945), Penicillin (Nobel Lecture), Nobel Foundation).
  28. Furchgott, R. F. (1993), The discovery of endothelium dependent relaxation, Circulation (Supplement V), 85: V3–V8.Google Scholar
  29. Gabor, D. (1971), Holography 1948–1971 (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  30. Garfield, E. (1980), Are the 1979 prizewinners of Nobel class? Current Contents Number 38: 5–13 (Available in Scholar
  31. Garfield, E. (1989a), Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: Citation frequency analyses aids the search for case histories, Current Contents 23: 3–9 (Available in: Scholar
  32. Garfield, E. (1989b), More delayed recognition. Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short-term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer rheology. Current Contents, 38: 3–8 (Available in Scholar
  33. Garfield, E. (1989c), The 1988 Nobel Prize in chemistry goes to J. Deisenhofer, R. Huber, H. Michel for elucidating photosynthetic processes. Current Contents, 22: 3–8 (Available in: Scholar
  34. Garfield, E. (1990), More delayed recognition. Part 2. From inhibin to scanning electron microscopy, Current Contents,9: 3–9 (Available in: Scholar
  35. Garfield, E. (1992), The 1991 Nobel Prize winners — From patch clamps (Neher and Sakmann) to spaghetti theory (de Gennes), social costs (Coase) and NMR (Ernst) — Were all citation superstars, Current Contents, 5: 3–9 (Available in: Scholar
  36. Gell-Mann, M. (1982), Strangeness, Journal de Physique-Colloque C8-Supl. au #12, 43: c8-395-c8-408.Google Scholar
  37. Glashow, S. L. (1979), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  38. Heymans, C. (1963), A look at an old but still current problem, Annual Review of Physiology, 25: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ifill, G. (1999), Interview to Dr. Günter Blobel, Online News Hour ( /nobel_1999/blobel.html).
  40. Karle, J. (1985), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  41. Koelsch, C. F. (1957), Syntheses with triarylvinylmagnesium bromides, α,γ-Bisdiphenylene-β-phenylallyl, a stable free radical, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 79: 4439–4441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krebs, H. (1981), Reminiscences and Reflections, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Kroemer, H. (2000), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  44. Laidler, K. J., King, M. C. (1983), The development of transition-state theory, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87: 2657–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamb, W. E., Schleich, W. P., Scully, M. O., Townes, C. H. (1999), Laser Physics: Quantum controversy in action, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71: S263–S273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laughlin, R. B. (1998), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  47. Lauterbur, P. C. (2003), All Science is Interdisciplinary — From Magnetic Moments to Molecules to Men (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  48. Lee, D. M. (1997), The extraordinary phases of liquid 3He, Reviews of Modern Physics, 69: 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lock, S. (1985), Letter to P. B. S. Fowler, British Medical Journal, 290: 1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levi-Montalcini, R. (1986), The Nerve Growth Factor: Thirty-five Years Later (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  51. Marshall, B. J. (2005), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  52. Mullis, K. (1998), Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Munro, M. (2006), So obscure he won the Nobel Prize. National Post Online (
  54. Nissani, M. (1995), The plight of the obscure innovator in science: A few reflections on Campanario’s note, Social Studies of Science, 25: 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olney, W. (2000), Nobel men, UCLA-Magazine,
  56. Planck, M. (1949), Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  57. Prusiner, S. B. (1997), Autobiography, (The Nobel Foundation).
  58. Redner, H. (1987), Pathologies of science, Social Epistemology, 1: 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson, A. L. (1986), Electron microscope inventors share Nobel Physics prize, Science, 234: 821–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruska, E. (1986), The development of the electron microscope and of electron microscopy (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).
  61. Schram, F. R. (1992), Anatomy of a controversy (book review), American Zoologist, 32: 357–358.Google Scholar
  62. Shepherd, G. B. (1995), Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process, Thomas Horton and Daughters, Sun Lakes, Arizona.Google Scholar
  63. Shockley, W. (1972), How we invented the transistor, New Scientist, 56: 689–691.Google Scholar
  64. Sommer, T. J. (2001), Suppression of scientific research: Bahramdipity and nulltiple scientific discoveries, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steinberger, J. (1997), Early particles, Annual Review of Nuclear Particles Science, 47: 12–42.Google Scholar
  66. Stent, G. S. (1972), Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery, Scientific American, 227: 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stent, G. S. (2002), Prematurity in scientific discovery. In: E. B. Hook (Ed.) Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. On Resistance and Neglect, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  68. Strom, E. T. (1989), Referees I have known?, New Journal of Chemistry, 13: 1–3.Google Scholar
  69. Temin, H. M. (1977), Citation Classics commentary on Nature, 226: 1211–1213, 1970 (Available in: Scholar
  70. Tiselius, A. (1968), Reflections from both sides of the counter, Annual Review of Biochemistry, 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weller, A. (2001), Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses (Information Today, Inc, ASIST Monograph Series, Medford, NJ).Google Scholar
  72. Wigner, E. P. (1979), Citation Classics commentary on Ann. Math. 40: 149–204, 1939 (Available in: Scholar
  73. Willstätter, R. M. (1965), From my Life, W.A. BENJAMIN, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Yalow, R. S. (1978), Radioimmunoassay: A probe for the fine structure of biologic systems, Science, 200: 1236–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zernike, F. (1953), How I discovered phase contrast (Nobel Lecture), (The Nobel Foundation).

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de AlcaláAlcalá de Henares, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations