, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 539–551 | Cite as

Publication activity in complementary and alternative medicine

  • Jenny-Ann Brodin Danell
  • Rickard Danell


In this article we analyse how research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) break through into one established scientific arena, namely academic journals. With help from bibliometric methods we analyse publication of CAM articles, in the Medline database, during the period 1966–2007. We also analyse the general content of the articles and in what journals they get published. We conclude that the publication activity of CAM articles increases rapidly, especially in the late 1990s, and that the changing growth rate is not due to the general expansion of Medline. The character of CAM articles has changed towards more clinical oriented research, especially in subfields such as acupuncture and musculoskeletal manipulations. CAM articles are found both in core clinical journals and in specialized CAM journals. Even though a substantial part of the articles are published in CAM journals, we conclude that the increasing publication activity is not restricted to the expansion of these specialized journals.


Alternative Medicine Publication Activity Complementary Therapy Public Health Sector Journal Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astin, J. A. (1998), Why patients use alternative medicine — Results of a national study, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(19): 1548–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brodin, J.-A. (2001), Religion till Salu? En sociologisk studie av New Age i Sverige. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  3. Cant, S., Sharma, U. (1999), A New Medical Pluralism? Alternative Medicine, Doctors, Patients and the State. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  4. Druss, B. G., Rosenheck, R. A. (1999), Association between use of unconventional therapies and conventional medical services, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(7): 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Easthope. G. (2003), Alternative, complementary, or integrative?, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 11(1): 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenberg, D. M. & al. (1993), Unconventional medicine in the united states — Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use, The New England Journal of Medicine, 328(4): 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenberg, D. M. & al. (1998), Trends in alternative medicine use in the united states, 1990–1997, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 1569–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eklöf, M. (Ed.), (2004), Perspektiv på komplementär medicin. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  9. Ernst, E., White, A. (2000), The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 8(1): 32–36.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, P., Ward, A. (1994), Complementary medicine in Europe, British Medical Journal, 309(6947): 107–111.Google Scholar
  11. Gieryn, T. F. (1999), Cultural Boundaries of Science — Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gorski, T. (1996), Defining and assessing alternative medicine practices, JAMA — Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(3): 195–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, P., Rees, R. (2000), The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population: a systematic review of the literature, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, (8): 88–96.Google Scholar
  14. Hess, D. (1987), Religion, heterodox science and Brazilian culture, Social Studies of Science, 17(3): 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess, D. (2002), Complementary or alternative? Stronger vs weaker integration policies, American Journal of Public Health, 92(10): 1579–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess, D. (1993), Science in the New Age — the Paranormal, Its defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, D. J. (1995), Science and Technology in a Multicultural World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jütte, R. (2001), Alternative medicine and medico-historical semantics. In: Jütte, R., Eklöf, M., Nelson, M. C. (Ed.), (2001), Historical Aspects of Unconventional Medicine — Approaches, Concepts, Case Studies. Sheffield: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Jütte, R., Eklöf, M, Nelson, M. C. (Ed.) (2001), Historical Aspects of Unconventional Medicine — Approaches, Concepts, Case Studies. Sheffield: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Kelner, M. & & al. (2004), The role of the state in the social inclusion of complementary and alternative occupations, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 12: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacLennan, A. H., Wilson, D. H., Taylor A. W. (1996), Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia, Lancet, 347(9001): 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, S. C. (1994), The only truly scientific method of healing, chiropractic and american science, 1895–1990, Isis, 85: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mauskopf, S., McVaugh, M. (1980), The Elusive Science: Origins of Experimental Psychology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Millar, W. J. (1997), Use of alternative health care by Canadians, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 88(3): 154–158.Google Scholar
  25. Salmon, J. W. (Ed.), (1984), Alternative Medicines —Popular and Policy Perspectives. New York: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Star, S. L., Griesemer, J. R. (1989), Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939, Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Worsley, P. (1982), Non-western medical systems, Annual Review of Anthropology, 11: 315–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xue, C. C. L. & al. (2007), Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: A national population-based survey, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(6): 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations