Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 79, Issue 2, pp 435–449 | Cite as

An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks

  • Fuyuki YoshikaneEmail author
  • Takayuki Nozawa
  • Susumu Shibui
  • Takafumi Suzuki
Article

Abstract

Although many studies have analyzed the “synchronic” correlation of properties between authors and their co-authors, the “diachronic” correlation of properties, i.e., the correlation between their subsequent and precedent activity, has not yet been sufficiently studied using quantitative methods. This study pays attention not only to productivity but also the importance in the collaboration network as a measure of the researcher’s activity, and clarifies whether there is any connection between (i) the researcher’s activity subsequent to a collaboration and (ii) the collaborator’s precedent activity, aiming at deriving knowledge about the diachronic effect of collaborators.

Keywords

Collaboration Network Past Activity Precedent Activity Core Journal Coauthorship Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, A. E., Persson, O. (1993), Networking scientists. Annals of Regional Science, 27(1): 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahr, A. H., Zemon, M. (2000), Collaborative authorship in the journal literature: Perspectives for academic librarians who wish to publish. College & Research Libraries, 61(5): 410–419.Google Scholar
  3. Bindon, G. (1981), Output measures of cooperative research: The case of the Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada. Scientometrics, 3(2): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, J. E. (1997), Authorship patterns in marine mammal science, 1985–1993. Scientometrics, 39(1): 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordons, M., Gómez, I. (2000), Collaboration networks in science. In: B. Cronin, H. B. Atkins (Eds), Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford: Information Today, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
  6. Cason, J. A. (1992), Authorship trends in poultry science, 1981 through 1990. Poultry Science, 71(8): 1283–1291.Google Scholar
  7. Fonseca, L., Velloso, S., Wofchuk, S., De Meis, L. (1998), The relationship between advisors and students. Scientometrics, 41(3): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frieze, I. H., Knoble, J. M., Mitroff, I. I. (1981), American university students’ beliefs about success in science: A case study. Scientometrics, 3(2): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayashi, T., Tomizawa, H. (2006), Restructuring the Japanese national research system and its effect on performance. Scientometrics, 68(2): 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleinberg, J. M. (1998), Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. In: Proceedings of 9th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 668–677.Google Scholar
  11. Kretschmer, H. (1994), Coauthorship networks of invisible-colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30(1): 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kretschmer, H. (1997), Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics, 40(3): 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kretschmer, H., Gupta. B. M. (1998), Collaboration patterns in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 43(3): 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kundra, R., Kretschmer, H. (1999), A new model of scientific collaboration Part 2: Collaboration patterns in Indian medicine. Scientometrics, 46(3): 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liang, L., Kretschmer, H., Guo, Y., Beaver, D. (2001), Age structures of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics, 52(3): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang, L., Liu, J., Rousseau, R. (2004), Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics, 61(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Long, J. S., Mcginnis, R. (1985), The effects of the mentor on the academic career. Scientometrics, 7(3): 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lotka, A. J. (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12): 317–323.Google Scholar
  19. Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., Paunonen, S. V. (1983), Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors. Scientometrics, 5(2): 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Testa, J. (2004), The Thomson Scientific Journal Selection Process. Retrieved September 7, 2007 from: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/
  21. Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., Tsuji, K. (2006), Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3): 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zobel, J. (1999), Guideline on Research Practice in Computer Science. Retrieved September 7, 2007 from: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/:_jz/conduct.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fuyuki Yoshikane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takayuki Nozawa
    • 2
  • Susumu Shibui
    • 3
  • Takafumi Suzuki
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Research for University EvaluationNational Institution for Academic Degrees and University EvaluationTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Symbiotic Science and TechnologyTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Office of Institutional ResearchKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information StudiesUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations