Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences?


At present China is challenging the leading sciento-economic powers and evolving to one of the world’s largest potentials in science and technology. Jointly with other emerging economies, China has already changed the balance of power among the formerly leading nations as measured by scientific production.

In the present paper, the evolution of China’s publication activity and citation impact in the social sciences is studied for the period 1997–2006. Besides the comparative analysis of trends in publication and citation patterns and of national publication profiles, an attempt is made to interpret the results in both the regional and global context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. BBC (2004), Japan’s internet ’suicide clubs’. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4071805.stm.

  2. Beaver, D. De B. (2001), Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present and prospective, Scientometrics, 52: 365–377.

  3. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1985), Scientometric Indicators. A32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore Philadelphia 1985, 424 pp.

  4. Braun, T., Glänzel, W. (1996), International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2): 147–254.

  5. Bourke, P., Butler, L., Biglia, B. (1996), Monitoring Research in the Periphery: Australia and the ISI Indices, Research Evaluation and Policy Project, Monograph Series No. 3.

  6. Butler, L., (2003), How do we value and measure academic research publications? Paper presented at the conference Death of the Book?: Challenges and Opportunities for Scholarly Publishing organised by the National Scholarly Communications in Sydney on 7–8 March 2003.

  7. Cheng, Q., (2004). 中国社会科学发展的历史特点 (The historical characteristics of the development of Chinese social sciences), 学术前沿 Academic Frontiers, (3): 5–10.

  8. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., La Barre, K. (2003), A cast of thousands: Co-authorship and subauthorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly literature of psychology and philosophy, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 855–871.

  9. Delamont, S. (1989), Citation and social mobility research: self-defeating behaviour, Sociological Review, 37(2): 332–337.

  10. Dong, Jq. (1999), The development of Chinese social sciences. In: Review and Forecast: Chinese Social Sciences in the 21st Century (中国社会科学的形成和发展. 回顾与展望: 面向21世纪的中国社会科学), Publishing House of Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.

  11. Frame, J. D. (1977), Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143–148.

  12. Glänzel, W. (1996), A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992, Scientometrics, 35(3): 291–307.

  13. Glänzel, W., Czerwon, H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37(2): 195–221.

  14. Glänzel, W. (1997), On the reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes, Scientometrics, 40(3): 481–492.

  15. Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences, Information Processing and Management, 35: 31–44.

  16. Glänzel, W. (2001), National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, 51(1): 69–115.

  17. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004), Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: H. F. M. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 257–276.

  18. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K. (2005), Research insights into the use of bibliometric indicators for social sciences and humanities. Paper presented at the Symposium on “Bibliometrics in the Humanities”, Brussels, Belgium, 26 January 2005.

  19. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B, Schubert, A., Thijs, B. (2006), Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics, 68(3): 457–473.

  20. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Meyer, M. (2008), ’Triad’ or ‘Tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world, Scientometrics, 74(1): 59–76.

  21. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B. (2007), National research profiles in the changing Europe (1983–2003). An exploratory study on sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 70(2): 267–275.

  22. Godin, B. (2002), The Social Sciences in Canada: What Can We Learn from Bibliometrics? Project on the Measurement of the Social Sciences, Working Paper no. 1.

  23. Hicks, D. (1999), The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, 44(2): 193–215.

  24. Hicks, D. (2004), The four literatures of social science. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 473–496.

  25. ISTIC (2006), 年度中国科技论文统计结果 (Statistic results of Chinese science and technology publications in 2005).

  26. Jiang, Y.H. (2005), 中国社会科学百年论纲 (An overview on the development of Chinese social sciences in the past 100 years), 学术月刊 Academic Monthly, (8): 5–10.

  27. Jin, B.-H., Rousseau, R. (2005), Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research — The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer, Netherlands.

  28. Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

  29. Katz, J. S. (1999), Bibliometric Indicators and the Social Sciences, ESRC Report.

  30. Kyvik, S. (1988), Internationality of the social sciences: the Norwegian case, International Social Science Journal, 163–172.

  31. Leclerc, M., Gagne, J. (1997), International scientific cooperation-the continentalization of science, Scientometrics, 31: 253–263.

  32. Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. (2007), Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system, In: D. Torres-Salinas, H. Moed (Eds), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol. 1, pp. 499–507, CSIC, Madrid, 21–25 June 2007.

  33. MOE (2007a), (2006年全国教育事业发展统计公报) The Statistic Bulletin on the Development of Education in 2006. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/.

  34. MOE (2007b), 普通高等学校人文、 社会科学研究与发展经费情况 (Humanities and social sciences R & D expenditure in regular HEIs). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=1948&infoid=27063

  35. MOE (2007c), 普通高等学校人文、 社会科学人力情况 (Professional manpower in regular HEIs in the fields of the humanities and social science). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=1948&infoid=27062

  36. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R.E., Van Leeuwen, Th. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicatiors and first applications, Scientometrics, 33: 381–442.

  37. Moed, H. F. (2002), Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 53(3): 281–296.

  38. Moed, H. F., (2005), Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, The Netherlands, 147–152.

  39. Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A. (1991), Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5): 332–340.

  40. Pierce, S. (1987), Characteristics of professional knowledge structures: some theoretical implications of citation studies, LISR, 9: 143–171.

  41. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., Braun, T. (1989), World flash on basic research: Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 16(1–6): 3–478.

  42. Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1990), World flash on basic research: International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 19: 3–10.

  43. SciDev (2007), China ranks second in S&T publication rates. Available at: http://www.scidev.net/content/news/eng/china-ranks-second-in-st-publication-rates.cfm.

  44. Sen, S. K., Gan, S. K. (1983), A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications, Annals of Library Science’ and Documentation, 30: 78–82.

  45. Winterhager, M. (1994), Bibliometricsche Basisdaten zur Entwicklung der Sozialwissenschaften in Deutschland, In: Best, H. & al. (Eds.), Informations-und Wissenservarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften. Opladen 1994, 539–551.

  46. Yu, G. (2005), Accomplishments and problems: a review of China’s reform in the past twenty-three years. In: Tian, YC. (Ed), The Chinese Model of Modern Development, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 23–53.

  47. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science, Research Policy, 35(1): 83–104.

  48. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2007a), A comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2): 223–236.

  49. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2007b), The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics, Scientometrics, 72(2): 185–200.

  50. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L (2008), China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006. In preparation.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ping Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, P., Thijs, B. & Glänzel, W. Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences?. Scientometrics 79, 593–621 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2068-x

Download citation


  • Citation Rate
  • Citation Impact
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Science Citation Index Expand
  • Bibliographic Coupling