Scientometrics

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 517–539 | Cite as

Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system

  • Giovanni Abramo
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
  • Alessandro Caprasecca
Article

Abstract

The literature dedicated to the analysis of the difference in research productivity between the sexes tends to agree in indicating better performance for men. Through bibliometric examination of the entire population of research personnel working in the scientific-technological disciplines of Italian university system, this study confirms the presence of significant differences in productivity between men and women. The differences are, however, smaller than reported in a large part of the literature, confirming an ongoing tendency towards decline, and are also seen as more noticeable for quantitative performance indicators than other indicators. The gap between the sexes shows significant sectorial differences. In spite of the generally better performance of men, there are scientific sectors in which the performance of women does not prove to be inferior.

Keywords

Gender Difference Research Productivity Gini Coefficient Science Citation Index Full Professor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. (2007), Measuring science: Irresistible temptations, easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences. Current Science, 6: 762–766.Google Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Pugini, F. (2008), The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., Hall, D. E. (1978), Research notes: Correlates of faculty publication. Sociology of Education, 51: 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. (2003), Age effects in scientific productivity. The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR), Scientometrics, 58(1): 49–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CIVR (2006), Comitato di indirizzo per la Valutazione della Ricerca, Valutazione Triennale della Ricerca Italiana: VTR 2001-2003, http://vtr2006.cineca.it.
  6. Cole, J. R., Zuckerman, H. (1984), The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns in publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2: 217–258.Google Scholar
  7. Dickson, V. A. (1983), The determinants of publication rates of faculty members at a canadian university. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 13(2): 41–49.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, M. F. (1983), Pubblication productivity among scientists: a critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, M. F. (2005), Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gander, J. P. (1999), Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching. Research in Higher Education, 40(2): 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyde, J. S., Linn, M. C. (1988), Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 104: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Lamon, S. J. (1990), Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 107: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kyvik, S. (1990), Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leahey, E. (2006), Gender differences in productivity: research specialization as a missing link. Gender and Society, 20(6): 754–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, S., Bozeman, B. (2005), The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35(5): 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemoine, W. (1992), Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela, Scientometrics, 24(2): 281–295.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Linn, M. C., Peterson, A. C. (1985), Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis, Child Development, 56: 1479–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Long, J. S. (1987), Problems and Prospects for Research on Sex Differences in the Scientific Career. In: L. S. Dix (Ed.), Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering, National Academy Press. 157–169.Google Scholar
  19. Moed, H. F. (2002), The impact factors debate: the ISI’s uses and limits. Nature, 415, 731–732.Google Scholar
  20. Moravcsik, M. J. (1985), Applied scientometrics: an assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics, 7(3–6): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pripić, K. (2002), Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1): 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramsden, P. (1994), Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28: 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stack, S. (2004), Gender, Children and research Productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8) 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UE, (2006), Women and science-statistic indicators, SHE FIGURES 2006 Google Scholar
  25. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., Bryden, M. P. (1995), Magnitude of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables, Psychological Bulletin, 117: 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weingart, P. (2004), Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences? In: H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Eds), Handbook on Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht (The Netherlands), Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Xie, Y., Shauman, K. A. (1998), Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63: 847–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xie, Y., Shauman, K. A. (2003), Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England.Google Scholar
  29. Xie, Y., Shauman, K. A. (2004), Women in science: career processes and outcomes (review), Social Forces, 82(4): 1669–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zainab, A. N. (1999), Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 4(2): 73–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Abramo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    • 1
  • Alessandro Caprasecca
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, School of Engineering, Department of ManagementUniversity of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’ImpresaRomaItalia
  2. 2.Italian Research CouncilRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations