History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences
- 527 Downloads
This paper examines the genesis of journal impact measures and how their evolution culminated in the journal impact factor (JIF) produced by the Institute for Scientific Information. The paper shows how the various building blocks of the dominant JIF (published in the Journal Citation Report - JCR) came into being. The paper argues that these building blocks were all constructed fairly arbitrarily or for different purposes than those that govern the contemporary use of the JIF. The results are a faulty method, widely open to manipulation by journal editors and misuse by uncritical parties. The discussion examines some solution offered to the bibliometrics and scientific communities considering the wide use of this indicator at present.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brodman, E. (1944), Choosing physiology journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 32(4): 479–483.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H. (1956), Scientific serials: characteristics and lists of most cited publications in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology, physiology, botany, zoology, and entomology. ACRL Monograph no. 16. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, E. R. (1935), The present status of the publication of literature in the medical and biological sciences. Bull Med Libr Assoc., 24(1): 64–81.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E., Sher, I. H. (1963A), Genetics Citation Index. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
- Hackh, I. (1936), The periodicals useful in the dental library. Bull Med Libr Assoc., 25(1–2) : 109–112.Google Scholar
- Henkle, H. H. (1938), The periodical literature of biochemistry. Bull Med Libr Assoc., 27(2): 139–147.Google Scholar
- Huth, E. J. (2001), Authors, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(1): 14–17.Google Scholar
- Martyn, J., Gilchrist, A. (1968), An Evaluation of British Scientific Journals (1 ed.): Aslib.Google Scholar
- Pudovkin, A. I., Garfield, E. (2004), Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 41: 507–515.Google Scholar
- Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 497.Google Scholar
- Smith, R. (1997), Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. British Medical Journal, 314(7079): 463.Google Scholar
- Zipf, G. K. (1949), Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, Ma.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar