Scientometrics

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 541–550 | Cite as

Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus

Article

Abstract

Impact factors for 20 journals ranked first by Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared with the same indicator calculated on the basis of citation data obtained from Scopus database. A significant discrepancy was observed as Scopus, though results differed from title to title, found in general more citations than listed in JCR. This also affected ranking of the journals. More thorough examination of two selected titles proved that the divergence resulted mainly from difference in coverage of two products, although other important factors also play their part.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., Wang, L. (2006), Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3. Text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
  2. Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., Lin, A. (2007), Some measures for comparing citation databases, Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., Van De Sompel, H. (2006), Journal status, Scientometrics, 69(3): 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Moya-Anegon, F., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Alvarez, E., Munoz-Fernandez, F. J., Gonzalez-Molina, A., Herrero-Solana, V. (2007), Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach, Scientometrics, 73(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1996), Average and global impact of a set of journals, Scientometrics, 36(1): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (2002), A general framework for relative impact indicators, The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27: 29–48.Google Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1983), Quality control at ISI: A piece of your mind can help us in our quest for error-free bibliographic information, Current Contents, 19: 5–12.Google Scholar
  8. Garfield, E. (1990), Journal editors awaken to the impact of citation errors. How we control them at ISI, Current Contents, 41: 5–13.Google Scholar
  9. Garfield, E., Sher, I. H. (1963), New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing, American Documentation, 14(3): 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glänzel, W., Moed, H. F. (2002), Journal impact measures in bibliometric research, Scientometrics, 53(2): 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46): 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacso, P. (2004), ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus, Online, 28(6): 51–54.Google Scholar
  13. Jacso, P. (2005), As we may search - comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases, Current Science, 89(9): 1537–1547.Google Scholar
  14. Laguardia, C. (2005), Scopus vs. web of science, Library Journal, 130(1): 40–42.Google Scholar
  15. Libmann, F. (2007), Web of Science, Scopus, and Classical Online: Philosophies of searching, Online, 31(3): 36–40.Google Scholar
  16. Meho, L. I., Yang, K. (2007), Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinsky, G., Narin, F. (1976), Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics, Information Processing & Management, 12(5): 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pislyakov, V. V. (2007), Methods for assessment of scientific knowledge through citation indicators, Sotsiologicheskii Zhurnal, 1: 128–140 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. Roth, D. L. (2005), The emergence of competitors to the Science Citation Index and the Web of Science, Current Science, 89(9–10): 1531–1536.Google Scholar
  20. Rousseau, R. (1988), Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In: Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., (Eds), Informetrics 87/88, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 249–262.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, R. (2002), Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues, Library Trends, 50(3): 418–439.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Hooydonk, G., Gevaert, R., Milis-Proost, G., Van De Sompel, H., Debackere, K. (1994), A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factors of scientific disciplines, Scientometrics, 30(1): 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations