Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus
Impact factors for 20 journals ranked first by Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared with the same indicator calculated on the basis of citation data obtained from Scopus database. A significant discrepancy was observed as Scopus, though results differed from title to title, found in general more citations than listed in JCR. This also affected ranking of the journals. More thorough examination of two selected titles proved that the divergence resulted mainly from difference in coverage of two products, although other important factors also play their part.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., Wang, L. (2006), Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3. Text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
- Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (2002), A general framework for relative impact indicators, The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27: 29–48.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1983), Quality control at ISI: A piece of your mind can help us in our quest for error-free bibliographic information, Current Contents, 19: 5–12.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1990), Journal editors awaken to the impact of citation errors. How we control them at ISI, Current Contents, 41: 5–13.Google Scholar
- Jacso, P. (2004), ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus, Online, 28(6): 51–54.Google Scholar
- Jacso, P. (2005), As we may search - comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases, Current Science, 89(9): 1537–1547.Google Scholar
- Laguardia, C. (2005), Scopus vs. web of science, Library Journal, 130(1): 40–42.Google Scholar
- Libmann, F. (2007), Web of Science, Scopus, and Classical Online: Philosophies of searching, Online, 31(3): 36–40.Google Scholar
- Pislyakov, V. V. (2007), Methods for assessment of scientific knowledge through citation indicators, Sotsiologicheskii Zhurnal, 1: 128–140 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- Roth, D. L. (2005), The emergence of competitors to the Science Citation Index and the Web of Science, Current Science, 89(9–10): 1531–1536.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, R. (1988), Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In: Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., (Eds), Informetrics 87/88, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 249–262.Google Scholar