Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 99–111 | Cite as

Growth cycles of knowledge

  • Marek SzydłowskiEmail author
  • Adam Krawiec
Article

Abstract

We have developed a way of describing the increase with time of the number of papers in a scientific field and apply it to a data base of about 2000 papers on symbolic logic published between 1666 and 1934. We find (a) a general exponential increase in the cumulative total number of papers, (b) oscillations around this due to the appearance of new ideas in the field and the time required for their full incorporation, and (c) exogenously caused fluctuations due to wars and other non-scientific events.

Keywords

Periodic Orbit Growth Cycle Exponential Trend Important Publication Theoretical Population Genetic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. J. Barro, X. Sala-I-Martin, Economic Growth. Second Edition. (2004) MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. Church, A bibliography of symbolic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1936) 1: 121–218.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. J. Church, Additions and corrections to ‘A bibliography of symbolic logic.’ Journal of Symbolic Logic, (1938) 3: 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. J. DE Solla Price, Science since Babylon. (1961) Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Goffman, Mathematical approach to the spread of scientific ideas — the history of mast cell research. Nature, (1966) 212(5061): 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Goffman, G. Harman, Mathematical approach to prediction of scientific discovery. Nature, (1971) 229(5280): 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. H. Greene, Econometric Analysis, 4th edition, (2000) Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. C. Griffith, Derek Price (1922–1983) and the social study of science. Scientometrics, (1984) 6: 5–7.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Guckenheimer, P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. (1983) Springer, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. M. Gupta, C. R. Karisiddappa, Modelling of growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, (2000) 49: 321–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Kochen, A. Blaivas, A model for the growth of mathematical specialities. Scientometrics, (1981) 3: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Müller, Fortschritt der Wissenschaft — mathematical Modelliert. Wissenschaft und Fortschritt, (1972) 22: 162–165.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. D. Puzikov, A. E. Kasjanov, Quantitative estimation of Big and Little Science interrelation. Scientometrics, (1987) 11: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Romer, Advanced Macroeconomics. (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Szalay, private information.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Szydłowski, A. Krawiec, Scientific cycle model with delay. Scientometrics, (2001) 52: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Astronomical ObservatoryJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical PhysicsCatholic University of LublinLublinPoland
  3. 3.Institute of Economics and ManagementJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  4. 4.Mark Kac Complex Systems Research CentreJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations