Scientometrics

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 481–503 | Cite as

An empirical study of the accessibility of web references in two Chinese academic journals

Article

Abstract

To discover the current situation and characteristics of web reference accessibility, the present study examined the accessibility of 1,637 web references in two key Chinese academic journals published from 1999 to 2003. The author develops linear regression models to demonstrate the decay of web reference accessibility. The study examines the influence of high use of web references in a paper, the associations between web reference accessibility and generic domain, country domain, protocol, and resource type, respectively, and classifies inaccessible web references according to Internet Explorer feedbacks. It compares the retrieval efficacy among three kinds of retrieval methods and reports on the limitations of Internet Archive.

Keywords

Content Description Internet Archive American Medical Informatics Association Internet Reference Chinese Academic Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, G., Ghoneim, I., Fadhli, A. (2005), Web references — will they be erased with time? Burns, 31 (2): 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronsky, D., Madani, S., Carnevale, R. J., Duda, S., Feyder, M. T. (2007), The prevalence and inaccessibility of Internet references in the biomedical literature at the time of publication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14 (2): 232–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axel-Lute, P. (1982), Legal citation form: Theory and practice, Law Library Journal, 75: 149–156Google Scholar
  4. Carnevale R. J., Aronsky, D. (2007), The life and death of URLs in five biomedical informatics journals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76 (4): 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casserly, M., Bird, J. (2003), Web citation availability: analysis and implications for scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 64 (4): 300–317.Google Scholar
  6. Crichlow, R., Winbush, N., Davies, S. (2004), Accessibility and accuracy of web page references in 5 major medical journals. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 292 (22): 2723–2724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai, L., Zhang, Q., Cai, R. (Ed.) (2000), A Guide to the Core Journals of China. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dellavalle, R. P., Hester, E. J., Heilig, L. F., Drake, A. L., Kuntzman, J. W., Graber, M., Schilling, L. M. (2003), Going, going, gone: Lost Internet references. Science, 302 (11): 787–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimitrova, D. V., Bugeja, M. (2006), Consider the source: Predictors of online citation permanence in communication journals. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6 (3): 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eysenbach, G., Trudel, M. (2005), Going, going, still there: Using the WebCite service to permanently archive cited web pages. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7 (5): e60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falagas, M. E., Karveli, E. A., Tritsaroli, V. I. (2008), The risk of using the Internet as reference resource: A comparative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77 (4): 280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garfield, E. (1979), Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley. Retrieved April 26, 2008, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ci/title.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. Germain, C. A. (2000), URLs: Uniform Resource Locators or Unreliable Resource Locators. College & Research Libraries, 61 (4): 359–365.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Grafton, A. (1997), The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Harter, S., Kim, H. (1996), Electronic Journals and scholarly communication: A citation and reference study. Information Research, 2 (3) Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/2-1/paper9a.html
  16. Herring, S. D. (2001), Using the World Wide Web for research: Are faculty satisfied. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27 (3): 213–219.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Hester, E. J., Heilig, L. F., Drake, A. L., Johnson, K. R., Vu, C. T., Schilling, L. M., Dellavalle, R. P. (2004), Internet citations in oncology journals: A vanishing resource? Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96 (12): 969–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kochen, M. (1987), How well do we acknowledge intellectual debts? Journal of Documentation, 43: 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koehler, W. (1999), An analysis of web page and website constancy and permanence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (2): 162–180.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Koehler, W. (2000), Digital libraries and World Wide Web sites and page persistence. Information Research, 4 (3) Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://InformationR.net/ir/4-4/paper60.html
  21. Koehler, W. (2002), Web page change and persistence — a four-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (2): 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koehler, W. (2004), A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: A report after six years. Information Research, 9 (2) Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper174.html
  23. Lawrence, S., Coetzee, F., Glover, E., Pennock, D. M., Flake, G., Nielsen, F. (2001), Persistence of web references in scientific research. IEEE Computer, 34 (2): 26–31.Google Scholar
  24. Lyman, P. (2002), Archiving the World Wide Web. Building a national strategy for digital preservation: Issues in digital media archiving. Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub106/web.html
  25. Madani, S, Carnevale, R. J., Duda, S. N., Feyder, M. T., Aronsky, D. (2006), Prevalence and inaccessibility of URLs in the biomedical literature. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2006: 1019.Google Scholar
  26. Markwell, J., Brooks, D. W. (2002), Broken links: The ephemeral nature of educational WWW hyperlinks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11 (2): 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markwell, J., Brooks, D. W. (2003), Link rot limits the usefulness of web-based educational material in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31 (1): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCown, F., Chan, S., Nelson, M. L., Bollen, J. (2005), The availability and persistence of web references in D-Lib Magazine. Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.OH/0511077
  29. Metcalfe, M. (2003), Author(ity): The literature review as expert witnesses. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4 (1) Retrieved April 26, 2008, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-03/1-03metcalfe-e.htm
  30. Nelson, M. L., Allen, B. D. (2002), Object persistence and availability in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 8 (1) Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january02/nelson/01nelson.html
  31. Olfson, E, Laurence J. (2005), Accessibility and longevity of Internet citations in a clinical AIDS journal. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 19 (1): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker, A. (2006), Link rot or how the inaccessibility of electronic citations affects the quality of New Zealand scholarly literature. LIANZA Conference 2006 Papers, Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://www.lianza.org.nz/library/files/store_014/LinkRot_AParker.pdf
  33. Rumsey, M. (2002), Runaway train: Problems of permanence, accessibility, and stability in the use of web sources in law review citations. Law Library Journal, 94 (2): 27–39.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, E., Kane, J. (2008), The missing link: Assessing the reliability of internet citations in history journals. Technology and Culture, 49 (2): 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schroeder, K. (2001), Education news in brief. The Education Digest, 66 (8): 71–72.Google Scholar
  36. Sellitto, C. (2004), A study of missing web-cites in schoarly articles: Towards an evaluation framework. Journal of Information Science, 30 (6): 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sellitto, C. (2005), The impact of impermanent web-located citations: A study of 123 scholarly conference publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (7): 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spinellis, D. (2003), The decay and failures of web references. Communications of the ACM, 46 (1): 71–77.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Sullivan, T. (1999), All things web. Retrieved May 14, 2006, from http://www.pantos.org/atw/35654.html
  40. Talluri, S. (2007), Method and system for using a communication network to archive and retrieve bibliography information and reference material. United States Patent. US7178097B1Google Scholar
  41. Thorp, A. W., Brown, L. (2007), Accessibility of Internet references in Annals of Emergency Medicine: Is it time to require archiving? Annals of Emergency Medicine, 50 (2): 188–192. e33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ticehurst, G. W., Veal, A. J. (2000), Business Research Methods: A Managerial Approach. Frenchs Forest, Australia: Longman.Google Scholar
  43. Wren, J. D. (2004), 404 not found: The stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE. Bioinformatics, 20 (5): 668–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wren, J. D., Johnson, K. R., Crockett, D. M., Heilig, L. F., Schilling, L. M., Dellavalle, R. P. (2006), Uniform resource locator decay in dermatology journals: Author attitudes and preservation practices. Archives of Dermatology, 142 (9): 1147–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouP. R. China

Personalised recommendations