Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 439–462 | Cite as

Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea?

  • Han Woo ParkEmail author
  • Loet Leydesdorff
Article

Abstract

During the last decade, we have witnessed a sustained growth of South Korea’s research output in terms of the world share of publications in the Science Citation Index database. However, Korea’s citation performance is not yet as competitive as publication performance. In this study, the authors examine the intellectual structure of Korean S&T field based on social network analysis of journal-journal citation data using the ten Korean SCI journals as seed journals. The results reveal that Korean SCI journals function more like publication places, neither research channels nor information sources among national scientists. Thus, these journals may provide Korean scholars with access to international scientific communities by facilitating the respective entry barriers. However, there are no citation relations based on their Korean background. Furthermore, we intend to draw some policy implications which may be helpful to increase Korea’s research potential.

Keywords

Social Network Analysis Science Citation Index Citation Network Korean Phys Complete Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  2. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Marx, W. (2007), Citation environment of Angewandte Chemie. CHIMIA, 61 (3): 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choung, J.-Y., Min, H.-G., Park, M.-C. (2003), Patterns of knowledge production: The case of information and telecommunication sector in Korea. Scientometrics, 58 (1): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman, L. C. (1979), Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1: 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim, H., Park, H. W., Thelwall, M. (2006), Comparing academic hyperlink structures with journal publishing in Korea: A social network analysis. Science Communication, 27 (4): 540–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim, K. (2004), The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references. Scientometrics, 59 (1): 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, M.-J. (2005) Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000, Scientometrics, 63 (2): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim, M.-J., Kim, B.-J. (2000), A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992–1998. Journal of Information Science, 26 (2): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. King, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430 (15 July 2004)Google Scholar
  10. Korean Institute Of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) (2006), Analysis on the SCI DB Evaluation Research Ability in the Science & Technology Fields in Korea, II. Seoul: KISTEP.Google Scholar
  11. Kostoff, R. (2004), The (scientific) wealth of nations. The Scientist, 18 (18): 10.Google Scholar
  12. Leydesdorff, L. (2007), Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58 (1): 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leydesdorff, L., Jin, B. (2005), Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (14): 1469–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leydesdorff, L., Park, H. W. (in preparation), The Journal of Communication and the field of communication studies: Mapping scientific communication online. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P. (2005), Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63 (3): 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P. (2007), Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70 (3): 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., Leydesdorff, L. (2005), A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators, Scientometrics, 65 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park H. W., Thelwall, M. (2006), Web science communication in the age of globalization. New Media & Society, 8 (4): 629–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zhou, P., Leydesdorff, L. (2007), A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (2): 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.YeungNam UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations