Scientometrics

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 251–261 | Cite as

Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database

  • T. Markpin
  • B. Boonradsamee
  • K. Ruksinsut
  • W. Yochai
  • N. Premkamolnetr
  • P. Ratchatahirun
  • N. Sombatsompop
Article

Abstract

This article proposed a new index, so-called “Article-Count Impact Factor” (ACIF) for evaluating journal quality in light of citation behaviour in comparison with the ISI journal impact factors. The ACIF index was the ratio of the number of articles that were cited in the current year to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. In this work, we used 171 journal titles in materials categories published in the years of 2001–2004 in international journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database as data source. It was found that ACIF index could be used as an alternative tool in assessing the journal quality, particularly in the case where the assessed journals had the same (equal or similar) JIF values. The experimental results suggested that the higher the ACIF value, the more the number of articles being cited. The changes in ACIF values were more dependent on the JIF values rather than the total number of articles. Polymer Science had the greatest ACIF values, suggesting that the articles in Polymer Science had greater “citation per article” than those in Metallurgical Engineering and Ceramics. It was also suggested that in order to increase a JIF value of 1.000, Ceramics category required more articles to be cited as compared to Metallurgical Engineering and Polymer Science categories.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, D. (2002), The counting house, Nature, 415: 726–729.Google Scholar
  2. Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., Gomez, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country, Scientometrics, 53: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colquhoun, D. (2003), Challenging the tyranny of impact factors, Nature, 423: 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csako, G. (2007), Analysis of the most highly cited articles from the 50-year history of CCA, Clinica Chimica Acta, 375: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garfield, E. (2001), Impact factors, and why they won’t go away, Nature, 411: 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, JAMA, 295: 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glänzel, W., Moed, H. F. (2002), Journal impact measures in bibliometric research, Scientometrics, 53: 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gowrishankar, J., Divakar, P. (1999), Sprucing up one’s impact factor, Nature, 401: 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pudovkin, A. I., Garfield, E. (2002), Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53: 1113–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314: 497.Google Scholar
  11. Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T. (2005), Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56: 676–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Trasatti, S. (2005), Editorial: Impact factor: the most cited papers of 2002, Electrochimica Acta, 51: 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F. (2002), Development and application of journal impact factor measures in the Dutch science system, Scientometrics, 53: 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vinkler, P. (2002), Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (impact) factors in practice, Scientometrics, 53: 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Markpin
    • 1
  • B. Boonradsamee
    • 2
    • 4
  • K. Ruksinsut
    • 4
  • W. Yochai
    • 2
  • N. Premkamolnetr
    • 3
  • P. Ratchatahirun
    • 1
  • N. Sombatsompop
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymer Processing and Flow (P-PROF) Group, School of EnergyEnvironment and Materials King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT)Thungkru, Bangmod, BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Thai-Journal Citation Index (TCI) Centre, KMUTT LibraryKing Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT)Thungkru, Bangmod, BangkokThailand
  3. 3.Policy Innovation (PI) CentreKing Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT)Thungkru, Bangmod, BangkokThailand
  4. 4.Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesPrince of Songkla UniversityPattaniThailand

Personalised recommendations