Scientometrics

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 163–174 | Cite as

A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions

Article

Abstract

We extend the pioneering work of J. E. Hirsch, the inventor of the h-index, by proposing a simple and seemingly robust approach for comparing the scientific productivity and visibility of institutions. Our main findings are that i) while the h-index is a sensible criterion for comparing scientists within a given field, it does not directly extend to rank institutions of disparate sizes and journals, ii) however, the h-index, which always increases with paper population, has an universal growth rate for large numbers of papers; iii) thus the h-index of a large population of papers can be decomposed into the product of an impact index and a factor depending on the population size, iv) as a complement to the h-index, this new impact index provides an interesting way to compare the scientific production of institutions (universities, laboratories or journals).

References

  1. 1.
    ISI Web Of Knowledge, http://portal.isiknowledge.com
  2. 2.
    J. E. Hirsch (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proc. Nat. Acad. Science, 102: 16569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Ball (2005), Index aims for fair ranking of scientists, Nature, 436: 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Saad (2006), Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively, Scientometrics, 69(1): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Glänzel (2006), On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67(2): 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals, Scientometrics, 69(1): 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. G. Banks (2006), An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds, Scientometrics, 69(1): 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    A. Molinari, J. F. Molinari (2008), Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index, Scientometrics, 75(2).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shanghai’s 2006 International university ranking: http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Mechanics and TechnologyEcole Normale Supérieure de CachanParisFrance
  2. 2.Laboratory of Physics and Mechanics of MaterialsUniversité Paul VerlaineMetzFrance

Personalised recommendations