A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions
We extend the pioneering work of J. E. Hirsch, the inventor of the h-index, by proposing a simple and seemingly robust approach for comparing the scientific productivity and visibility of institutions. Our main findings are that i) while the h-index is a sensible criterion for comparing scientists within a given field, it does not directly extend to rank institutions of disparate sizes and journals, ii) however, the h-index, which always increases with paper population, has an universal growth rate for large numbers of papers; iii) thus the h-index of a large population of papers can be decomposed into the product of an impact index and a factor depending on the population size, iv) as a complement to the h-index, this new impact index provides an interesting way to compare the scientific production of institutions (universities, laboratories or journals).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.ISI Web Of Knowledge, http://portal.isiknowledge.com
- 9.A. Molinari, J. F. Molinari (2008), Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index, Scientometrics, 75(2).Google Scholar
- 10.Shanghai’s 2006 International university ranking: http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm