A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions
- 604 Downloads
We extend the pioneering work of J. E. Hirsch, the inventor of the h-index, by proposing a simple and seemingly robust approach for comparing the scientific productivity and visibility of institutions. Our main findings are that i) while the h-index is a sensible criterion for comparing scientists within a given field, it does not directly extend to rank institutions of disparate sizes and journals, ii) however, the h-index, which always increases with paper population, has an universal growth rate for large numbers of papers; iii) thus the h-index of a large population of papers can be decomposed into the product of an impact index and a factor depending on the population size, iv) as a complement to the h-index, this new impact index provides an interesting way to compare the scientific production of institutions (universities, laboratories or journals).
KeywordsMaster Curve Impact Index International Ranking Paper Population Assess Research Impact
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.ISI Web Of Knowledge, http://portal.isiknowledge.com
- 9.A. Molinari, J. F. Molinari (2008), Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index, Scientometrics, 75(2).Google Scholar
- 10.Shanghai’s 2006 International university ranking: http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm