Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting
- 200 Downloads
Publication delay, chronological distance between completion of a scientific work and distribution of its achievements as a peer reviewed paper, is a negative phenomenon in scientific information dissemination. It can be further subdivided in successive stages corresponding to the peer review process and the technical preparation of accepted manuscripts. Formal online posting in electronic versions of journals has been considered as a shortening of the process.
To determine publication delay in a group of leading Food Research journals, as well as factors affecting this lag and also to compute the effect of formal online posting on the distribution of papers in electronic form. Secondary objective is also to study the possible effect of informal posting of papers through some repositories on the publication delay in the field.
14 Food Research journals were selected and 4836 papers published in 2004 were examined. Dates of first submission, submission of revised manuscripts, acceptation, online posting and final publication were recorded for each paper.
Data collected were analyzed using SPSS and SigmaPlot. Parametric correlation between some variables was determined and ANOVA was performed with BMDP package for significance analysis of differences among journals.
average publication delay of papers submitted to the set of selected journals is 348 ± 104 days, with European Food Research and Technology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry showing the shortest delays. Total delay strongly depends on the peer review process. On average, 85.75% of manuscripts are corrected prior to their acceptance by journals. Online posting of papers prior to their print publication reduces total delay in about 29%. On average, a paper is posted online 260 days after its submission to the set of journals.
Publication delay of papers is strongly dependent on the peer review process, which affects most of the manuscripts in the Food Research field. Advanced online publication through formal posting at the editor’s sites only slightly reduces the time between reception and final publication of papers.
KeywordsFood Chemistry Food Research Total Delay Peer Review Process Formal Online
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bhattacharjee, S., Tung, Y., Pathak, B. (2004), Author experiencies with the IS journal review process. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13: 629–653.Google Scholar
- Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G. (2001), Publication lapse of journals of analytical chemistry. Magyar Kémiai Folyóirat, 107: 313–317.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2002), An Assessment of the Implications for Basic Genetic Engineering Research of Failure to Publish, or Late Publication of, Papers on Subjects which Could Be Patentable as Required under Article 16(b) of Directive 98/44/EC on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council (Rep. No. [SEC(2002) 50]).Google Scholar
- Kling, R., Swygart-hobaugh, A. (2002), The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing (Rep. No. WP-02-12).Google Scholar
- Novek, P. S. (2006), “Peer to Patent”: Collective Intelligence and Intellectual Property Reform. 15th revision. The Peer to Patent Project [On-line]. Available: http://peertopatent.jot.com/WikiHome
- Rogers, G. W. (2006), Journal of dairy science 2005 editorial report. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 1369–1371.Google Scholar
- Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 498–502.Google Scholar
- Sittig, D., Kaalasittig, J. (1995), A quantitative ranking of the biomedical informatics serials. Methods of Information in Medicine, 34: 397–410.Google Scholar
- Stern, J., Shimes, R. (1997), Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. British Medical Journal, 315: 640–645.Google Scholar
- Strevens, M. (2003), The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy, 100: 55–79.Google Scholar
- Yokote, G., Utterback, R. A. (1974), Time lapses in information dissemination: research laboratory to physician’s office. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 62: 251–257.Google Scholar