Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 379–389 | Cite as

Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting

  • Carlos B. Amat
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Publication delay, chronological distance between completion of a scientific work and distribution of its achievements as a peer reviewed paper, is a negative phenomenon in scientific information dissemination. It can be further subdivided in successive stages corresponding to the peer review process and the technical preparation of accepted manuscripts. Formal online posting in electronic versions of journals has been considered as a shortening of the process.

Objectives

To determine publication delay in a group of leading Food Research journals, as well as factors affecting this lag and also to compute the effect of formal online posting on the distribution of papers in electronic form. Secondary objective is also to study the possible effect of informal posting of papers through some repositories on the publication delay in the field.

Methods

14 Food Research journals were selected and 4836 papers published in 2004 were examined. Dates of first submission, submission of revised manuscripts, acceptation, online posting and final publication were recorded for each paper.

Analysis

Data collected were analyzed using SPSS and SigmaPlot. Parametric correlation between some variables was determined and ANOVA was performed with BMDP package for significance analysis of differences among journals.

Results

average publication delay of papers submitted to the set of selected journals is 348 ± 104 days, with European Food Research and Technology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry showing the shortest delays. Total delay strongly depends on the peer review process. On average, 85.75% of manuscripts are corrected prior to their acceptance by journals. Online posting of papers prior to their print publication reduces total delay in about 29%. On average, a paper is posted online 260 days after its submission to the set of journals.

Conclusions

Publication delay of papers is strongly dependent on the peer review process, which affects most of the manuscripts in the Food Research field. Advanced online publication through formal posting at the editor’s sites only slightly reduces the time between reception and final publication of papers.

Keywords

Food Chemistry Food Research Total Delay Peer Review Process Formal Online 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, S. (2003), A comparison of early publication practices in the United States and Europe. World Patent Information, 25: 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharjee, S., Tung, Y., Pathak, B. (2004), Author experiencies with the IS journal review process. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13: 629–653.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G. (2001), Publication lapse of journals of analytical chemistry. Magyar Kémiai Folyóirat, 107: 313–317.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, J., Wyatt, H. V. (1983), Delays in the literature of medical microbiology — Before and after publication. Journal of Documentation, 39: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das, A., Das, P. (2006), Delay between online and offline issue of journals: A critical analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 28: 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G., Braun, T. (2001A), The publication speed of information in bibliographic chemical databases. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41: 1446–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G., Braun, T. (2001B), Publication speed in analytical chemistry journals. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41: 1452–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong, P., Loh, M., Mondry, A. (2006), Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model. Scientometrics, 69: 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egghe, L. (2000), The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2002), An Assessment of the Implications for Basic Genetic Engineering Research of Failure to Publish, or Late Publication of, Papers on Subjects which Could Be Patentable as Required under Article 16(b) of Directive 98/44/EC on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council (Rep. No. [SEC(2002) 50]).Google Scholar
  11. Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1964), Scientific information exchange in psychology. Science, 146: 1655–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kling, R., Swygart-hobaugh, A. (2002), The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing (Rep. No. WP-02-12).Google Scholar
  13. Luwel, M. (1998), Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 41: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nickerson, S. C. (2004), Journal of dairy science-2003. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 1122–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Novek, P. S. (2006), “Peer to Patent”: Collective Intelligence and Intellectual Property Reform. 15th revision. The Peer to Patent Project [On-line]. Available: http://peertopatent.jot.com/WikiHome
  16. Pask, J. M. (1988), Publication time lags of economics and business working papers. Collection Managemet, 10: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers, G. W. (2006), Journal of dairy science 2005 editorial report. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 1369–1371.Google Scholar
  18. Roland, G. C., Kirpatrick, R. A. (1975), Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences. New England Journal of Medicine, 292: 1273–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schroter, S., Tite, L., Smith, R. (2005), Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. British Medical Journal, 330: 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 498–502.Google Scholar
  21. Sittig, D., Kaalasittig, J. (1995), A quantitative ranking of the biomedical informatics serials. Methods of Information in Medicine, 34: 397–410.Google Scholar
  22. Stern, J., Shimes, R. (1997), Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. British Medical Journal, 315: 640–645.Google Scholar
  23. Strevens, M. (2003), The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy, 100: 55–79.Google Scholar
  24. Swan, A., Brown, S. (2003), Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology. Learned Publishing, 16: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tobin, M. J. (2004), Assessing the performance of a medical journal. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 169: 1268–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trivedi, P. (1993), An analysis of publication lags in econometrics. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8: 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Rooyen S. (2001), The evaluation of peer-review quality. Learned Publishing, 14: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wills, M., Wills, G. (1996), The ins and outs of electronic publishing. Internet Research, 6: 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yokote, G., Utterback, R. A. (1974), Time lapses in information dissemination: research laboratory to physician’s office. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 62: 251–257.Google Scholar
  30. Yu, G., Li, Y. J. (2006), A scientometric assessment of the information loss caused by the delays in publication of Chinese science journals. Journal of Information Science, 32: 78–87.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scientific Documentation and Library UnitInstituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Burjassot, ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations