Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the character and pattern of the linkage between science and technology in China, based on the database of United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The analysis is focused on the period 1995–2004, a rapid increasing period for Chinese US patents. Using the scientific non-patent references (NPRs) within patents, we investigate the science-technology connection in the context of Chinese regions as well as industrial sectors classified by International Patent Classification (IPC). 11 technological domains have been selected to describe the science intensity of the technology. The results suggest that the patents and the corresponding scientific citations are related in different ways. Finally, we match the scientific NPRs to the Science Citation Index (SCI) covered publications to identify the core journals and categories. It reveals that the scientific references covered by SCI show a skewed distribution not only in journals but also in categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, T. J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  2. Archibugi, D. (1992), Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: A review, Science and Public Policy, 19: 357–368.

  3. Bhattacharya, S., Kretschmer, H., Meyer, M. (2003), Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology, Scientometrics, 58(2): 369–390.

  4. Bhattacharya, S., Meyer, M. (2003), Large firms and the sicence-technology interface. Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films, Scientometrics, 58(2): 265–279.

  5. Bud, R. (1993), The Uses of Life: A History of Biotechnology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  6. Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M., Narin, F. (1980), Linkage between basic research and patents, Research Management, 23: 30–35.

  7. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., Walsh, J. (2002), Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48: 1–23.

  8. Collins, P., Wyatt, S. (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literature, Research Policy, 17: 65–74.

  9. David, P. A., Foray, D., Steinmueller, W. E. (1997), The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behaviour, In: Gambardella, A., Malerba, F. (Eds), The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe, Cambridge University Press.

  10. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.(1998), The endless transition: A ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations, Minerva, 36: 203–208.

  11. Griliches, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 27: 1661–1707.

  12. Grupp, H. (1998), Foundations of the Economics of Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, US.

  13. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U. (1992), Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers: Dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In: Grupp, H. (Ed.), Dynamics of Science Based Innovation. Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp. 73–122.

  14. Guan, J., Yam, R. C. M., Mok C. K. (2005), Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3): 339–353.

  15. Guan, J., Liu, S. (2005), Comparing regional innovative capacities of PR China-based on data analysis of the national patents, International Journal of Technology Management, 32(3/4): 225–245.

  16. Hinze, S., Schmoch, U. (2004), Opening the Black Box, In: Moed., H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  17. Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute (1969), Report on Project Traces, National Science Foundation, Washington DC.

  18. Iversen, E. J. (2000), An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting, Scientometrics, 49(1): 63–80.

  19. Le Pair, C. (1998), The citation gap of applicable science, In: A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science/North Holland, Amsterdam.

  20. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., (1996), Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23: 279–286.

  21. Luwel, M. (1999), Is the science citation index US-biased? Scientometrics, 46(3): 549–562.

  22. Meyer, M. (2000a), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29: 409–434.

  23. Meyer, M. (2000b), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations, Scientometrics, 47(2): 93–124.

  24. Meyer, M. (2002), Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems, Scientometrics, 54(2): 193–212.

  25. Meyer, M. (2006), Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy, Scientometrics, 66(2): 425–439.

  26. Mowery, C. D., Rosenberg, N. (1982), The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some empirical studies. In: Rosenberg, N. (Ed.), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 193–241.

  27. Narin, F. (1994), Patent bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 30(1): 147–155.

  28. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., Olivastro, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and science, Research Policy, 26: 317–330.

  29. Narin, F., Noma, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7: 369–381.

  30. Narin, F., Olivastro, D. (1992), Status report: Linkage between technology and science, Research Policy, 21: 237–330.

  31. Narin, F., Olivastro, D. (1998), Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison, Scientometrics, 41(1–2): 51–59.

  32. OECD (2004), Compendium of Patent Statistics, OECD, Paris.

  33. Pavitt, K. (1997), Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities? SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series, 6, November 1997.

  34. Pavitt, K., Patel, P. (1988), The international distribution of determinants of technological activities, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4: 35–55.

  35. Pavitt, K., Soete, L. (1980), Innovation activities and export shares: Some comparisons between industries and countries, In: K. Pavitt (Ed.), Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance, Macmillan, London.

  36. Ramani, S. V., De Looze, M. (2002a), Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biothechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K., Scientometrics, 54(3): 319–346.

  37. Ramani, S. V., De Looze, M. (2002b), Country-specific characteristics of patent applications in France, Germany and the U.K. in the biotechnology sectors, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(4): 457–480.

  38. Rip, A. (1992), Science and technology as dancing partners. In: Kroes, P., Bakker, M. (Eds), Technology Development and Science in the Industrial Age. Kluwer, n.p. pp. 231–270.

  39. Rojo, R., Gómez, I. (2006), Analysis of the Spanish scientific and technological output in the ICT sector, Scientometrics, 66(1): 101–121.

  40. Salter, A., Martin, B. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review, Research Policy, 30: 509–532.

  41. Schmoch, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26: 193–211.

  42. Schmoch, U. (1997), Indicators and the relations between Science and Technology, Scientometrics, 38: 103–116.

  43. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard UP.

  44. Sherwin, C., Isenson, R. (1967), Project hindsight, Science, 156: 571–577.

  45. Smith, K. (Ed.) (1998), Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators — A Guide for Policy-Makers, IDEA Report 5.

  46. Soete, L.G., Wyatt. S. M. E. (1983), The use of foreign patenting as an international comparable science and technology output indicator, Scientometrics, 5: 31–54.

  47. Steinmueller, W. E. (1994), Basic research and industrial innovation, Chapter 5 In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 54–66.

  48. Tijssen, R. J. W., Buter, R. K., Van Leeuwen, TH. N. (2000), Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47(2): 389–412.

  49. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001), Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Research Policy, 30: 35–54.

  50. Toynbee, A. J. (1963), Introduction: The Genesis of Civilisations, A Study of History, 12 vols, 1, 3, New York.

  51. Van Looy, B., Zimmermann, E., Veugelers, R., Verbeek, A., Mello, J., Debackere, K. (2003), Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains, Scientometrics, 57: 355–367.

  52. Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Callaert, J., Tijssen, R., Van Leeuwen, T. (2006), Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant, Scientometrics, 66(2): 295–310.

  53. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., Deleus, F. (2002), Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54(3): 399–420.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jiancheng Guan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guan, J., He, Y. Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages. Scientometrics 72, 403–425 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1741-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Patent Citation
  • Chinese Science
  • Patent Document
  • International Patent Classification
  • Chinese Patent