Scientometrics

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 225–252 | Cite as

An educational resource for information literacy in higher education: Functional and users analyses of the e-COMS academic portal

Article

Abstract

As in today’s knowledge society the Internet is playing an important role in the information literacy of university students the goal of this paper is to analyse, after its first year on the Web, the informational impact of an e-learning resource developed by Granada’s University lecturers (the e-COMS educational portal), a pioneer in Spain for training in information literacy. From the objective and subjective data provided by the own portal and by it users, two different and complementary kinds of analysis (functional and users’) are performed. Assessment of various capabilities, among which visibility and usability stand out, is provided. The highly positive but improvable results offer a detailed analysis of the functional aspects of the portal itself and of the users’ relations with this information resource. From these analyses strengths and weaknesses are extracted and some proposals for improvement are derived.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguillo, I. (2000), Contenidos de I+D en Internet: Mitos y leyendas, Mundo Científico, 211: 22–225.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabasi, A.-L. (1999), The diameter of the World Wide Web, Nature, 401: 130–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. E., Tate, M. A. (1999), Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.Google Scholar
  4. Almind, T. C., Ingwersen, P. (1997), Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to “webmetrics”, Journal of Documentation, 53(4): 404–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ALA, American Library Association, Association of College & Research Libraries (2005), Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, ALA, ACRL, Chicago, Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html (Cited: 14/04/2006).Google Scholar
  6. Badre, A. (2002), Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context, Addison-Wesley, Boston.Google Scholar
  7. Baeza, R., Rivera, C. (2002), Ubicuidad y Usabilidad en la Web, Santiago de Chile, Centro de Investigación de la Web, Available: http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/:_rbaeza/inf/usabilidad.html#inicio
  8. Bar-Ilan, J. (2000), The web as an information source on informetrics? A content analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5): 432–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batson, T., (2000), Campus Portals and faculty development, Paper presented at Syllabus, New dimensions in Educational Technology Conference, Boston, November 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Bawa, J., Dorazio, P., Trenner, L. (2001), The Usability Business: Making the Web Work, Springer, London, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Big Six Skill (1995), Available at http://www.big6.com (Cited: 15/04/2006)
  12. Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S. D. (2002), Designing Web Sites that Work: Usability for the Web, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, K., Aucoin, R. (2003), Value-based design of learning portals as new academic spaces, In: Jafari, A. (Ed.), Designing Portals: Opportunities and Challenges, Information Science Publishing, pp. 162–185.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, K., Hyatt, K., (2003), Customer-centered Design: A New Approach to Web Usability, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice Hall PTR.Google Scholar
  15. Chanlin, L.-J., Chang, C. C. (2003), Web-based library instruction for promoting information skills, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(4): 265–276.Google Scholar
  16. Clauson, J. R. (1999), Quality Management Resources on the Internet, Government Institutes, Rockville, Md.Google Scholar
  17. CCE, Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas (2002), El espacio europeo de la investigación: un nuevo impulso, COM 16 de octubre de 2002, 565.Google Scholar
  18. Commission of the European Communities (2003), Communication from the Commission, the Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Brussels, 5-02-2003, COM 58 final. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2003/com2003_0058en01.pdf (Cited:14/04/2006).
  19. Corry, M. D., Frick, T. W., Hansen, L. (1997), User-centered design and usability testing of a Web Site: An illustrative case study, Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. CAUL, Council of Australian University Librarians, (2005), Information Literacy Standards, CAUL, Canberra, Available at http://www.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/ (Cited: 14/04/2006).Google Scholar
  21. Denning, D., Smith, P. (1998), A case study in the development of an interactive learning environment to teach problem-solving skills, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(1): 3–36.Google Scholar
  22. DHI (1995), Desarrollo de Habilidades Informativas. Available at: http://bivir.uacj.mx/dhi/ (Cited: 04/09/06).
  23. Dustin, E., Rasca, J., Mcdiarmid, D. (2002), Quality Web Systems: Performance, Security, and Usability, Addison Wesley, Boston.Google Scholar
  24. Ellis, D., Furner-Hines, J., Willet, P. (1994), On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents: Measurement of inter-linker consistency. Journal of Documentation, 50(2): 67–98.Google Scholar
  25. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., Faloutsos, C. (1999), On Power-law Relationships of the Internet Topology, ACM SIGCOM, Cambridge, MA, September 1999, pp. 251–262.Google Scholar
  26. FORMIST (1998), Available at http://formist.enssib.fr/ (Cited: 14/04/2006).
  27. Gillham, M., Buckner, K. (1997), User evaluation of hypermedia encyclopedias, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(1): 77–90.Google Scholar
  28. Graham, I. (2002), A Pattern Language for Web Usability: How to Design Great Websites Using Software Patterns as a Guide, Pearson Professional Education.Google Scholar
  29. Guzdial, M. Kehoe, C. (1998), Apprenticeship-based learning environments: a principled approach to providing software-realized scaffolding through hypermedia, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(3/4): 289–336.Google Scholar
  30. Holmes, M. (2002), Web Usability and Navigation: A Beginner’s Guide, Osborne/McGraw-Hill, Berkeley, London.Google Scholar
  31. IFLA (2006), Information Literacy Section. Available at http://www.ifla.org/VII/s42/ (Cited: 14/04/2006).
  32. Jafari, A. (2003), Educational portal, In: White Paper. Designing Portals: Opportunities and Challenges, Information Science Publishing, pp. 270–290.Google Scholar
  33. King, H. J., Jannik, C. M., (2005), Redesigning for usability: Information architecture and usability testing for Geogia Tech Library’s website, OCLC Systems&Services, 21(3): 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koehler, W. C. (1999), Digital libraries and world wide web sites and page persistence, Information Research, 4(4), available at http://informationr.net/ir/4-4/paper60.html (cited: 06/06/06).
  35. Koehler, W. C. (1999b), An analysis of web page and web site constancy and permanence, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2): 162–180.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Krug, S. (2000), Don’t Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  37. Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L. (1999), Accessibility of information on the web, Nature, 400: 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mack, T., Manoff, M., Miller, T. J., Smith, A. D. (2004), Designing for experts: how scholars approach an academic library web site, Information Technology and Libraries, 23(1): 16–22.Google Scholar
  39. Maybee, C. (2006), Undergraduate perceptions of information use: The basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1): 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKiernan, (1996), Cited-sites (s): Citation Indexing of Web Resources, Available at http://www.public.iastate.edu/:_CYBERSTACKS/Cited.htm (Cited: 6/06/06).
  41. McLellan, H. (1997), Creating virtual communities via the web. In: Khan, B. H. (Ed.), Web-based Instruction, NJ. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
  42. Middleton, I., McConnell, M., Davidson, G. (1999), Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Web site, Journal of Information Science, 25(3): 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen, J. (1999), Designing Web Usability, New Riders, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  44. Nielsen, J. (2000), Why you only need to test with 5 users, Available at www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html (Cited: 14/04/06).Google Scholar
  45. Nielsen, J., Tahir, M. (2002), Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. New Riders, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  46. Norlin, E. (2002), Usability Testing for Library Websites: A Hands-on Guide, American Library Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. OCDE (2005), DeSeCo: Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations, Available at http://www.portal-stat.admin.ch/deseco/index.htm (Cited: 15/04/06).
  48. Okerson, A. (2003), Asteroid, Moore’s law and the star alliance, Journal of Academic librarianship, 2(5): 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearrow, M. (2002), The Wireless Web Usability Handbook, Charles River Media, Hingham, Mass.Google Scholar
  50. Maria Pinto, José Luis Alonso Berrocal, José Antonio Cordón García, Viviana Fernández Marcial, Carlos García Figuerola, Javier García Marco, Carmen Gómez Camarero, Ángel F. Zazo Rodríguez (2005), Quality assessment of Spanish universities’ web sites focused on the European Research Area, Scientometrics, 65(1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinto, M. (2006), Portal alfinEEES, Available at: http://www.mariapinto.es/alfineees
  52. Pinto, M., Alonso, J. L., Cordón, J. A., et al. (2004), Análisis cualitativo de la visibilidad de la investigación de las universidades españolas a través de su web, REDOC, 27(3): 345–370.Google Scholar
  53. Pinto, M., Doucet, A-V. (2006), A pilot initiative for information literacy in Spanish higher education: The e-coms, learning portal, In press.Google Scholar
  54. PLUS (1999), Available at http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/5to14/specialfocus/informationskills/ (Cited: 15/04/2006).
  55. Rousseau, R, (1997). Citations: an exploratory study, Cybermetrics, 1, 1, Available at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html (Cited: 6/06/06).
  56. SCONUL (2004), The Seven Pillars of Information Literacy. Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/activities/inf_lit/seven_pillars.html (Cited: 04/09/06).
  57. Sloim, E., Gateau, E. (2001), Critères généraux d’évaluation de la qualité des services en ligne, Temesis: La qualité des services en ligne. Cenon: Temesis, 2001–2003. Available at http://www.temesis.com/article/criteres_fr.html (Cited: 23/05/06).
  58. Smith, A., Thelwall, M., (2002), Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities, Scientometrics, 54(3): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. TAW: Test de accesibilidad web. http://www.tawdis.net/taw3/cms/es
  60. Thelwall, M. (2002), Conceptualizing documentation on the web: an evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university web sites, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12): 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. URFIST (1999), Cerise, Available at http://www.ext.upmc.fr/urfist/cerise/ (Cited: 04/09/06).
  62. Wiley, D. A. (2000), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, Available at http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc (Cited: 15/04/2006).
  63. Wroblewski, L. (2002), Site-seeing: A Visual Approach to Web Usability, Hungry Minds, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations