, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 253–280 | Cite as

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

  • Antonis Sidiropoulos
  • Dimitrios KatsarosEmail author
  • Yannis Manolopoulos


What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the prestige of a journal or a conference? The evaluation of the scientific work of a scientist and the estimation of the quality of a journal or conference has long attracted significant interest, due to the benefits by obtaining an unbiased and fair criterion. Although it appears to be simple, defining a quality metric is not an easy task. To overcome the disadvantages of the present metrics used for ranking scientists and journals, J. E. Hirsch proposed a pioneering metric, the now famous h-index. In this article we demonstrate several inefficiencies of this index and develop a pair of generalizations and effective variants of it to deal with scientist ranking and publication forum ranking. The new citation indices are able to disclose trendsetters in scientific research, as well as researchers that constantly shape their field with their influential work, no matter how old they are. We exhibit the effectiveness and the benefits of the new indices to unfold the full potential of the h-index, with extensive experimental results obtained from the DBLP, a widely known on-line digital library.


Digital Library Citation Index Citation Analysis Citation Network Journal Ranking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Ball, Index aims for fair ranking of scientists — h-index sums up publication record. Nature, 436(7053) (2005) 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. G. Banks, An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Bar-Ilan, h-index for price medalists revisited. ISSI Newsletter 5 (Jan. 2006).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. J. Barnes, Assessing the value of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 48(1) (2005) 110–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, A. S. Martinez, Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1) (2006) 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. A. Bernstein, E. Bertino, A. Heuer, C. J. Jensen, H. Meyer, M. Tamer Ozsu, R. T. Snodgrass, K.-Y. Whang, An apples-to-apples comparison of two database journals. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Bharati, P. Tarasewich, Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research. Communications of the ACM, 45(5) (2002) 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Bollen, M. A. Rodriguez, H. Van De Sompel, Journal status, (May 2006), Preprint available at
  9. 9.
    L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3) (2005) 391–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Cronin, L. Meho, Using the H-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9) (2006) 1275–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Egghe, Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time. Scientometrics, (2006), To appear.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Egghe, Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 131–152.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Elmacioglu, D. Lee, On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(2) (2005) 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178 (1972) 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Glänzel, On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2) (2006) 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. C. Hardgrave, K. A. Walstrom, Forums for MIS scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11) (1997) 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46) (2005) 16569–16572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. W. Holsapple, H. Johnson, L. E. Manakyan, J. Tanner, Business computing research journals: A normalized citation analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1) (1994) 131–140.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Katerattanakul, B. T. Han, S. Hong, Objective quality ranking of computing journals. Communications of the ACM, 46(10) (2003) 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Kelly Rainer, M. D. Miller, Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(2) (2005) 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5) (1999) 604–632.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Liang, h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Lowry, D. Romans, A. Curtis, Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2) (2004) 29–75.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. A. Mylonopoulos, V. Theoharakis, Global perception of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9) (2001) 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. A. Nascimento, J. Sander, J. Pound, Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3) (2003) 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. P. Nerur, R. Sikora, G. Mangalaraj, V. Balijepally, Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network. Communications of the ACM, 48(11) (2005) 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Technical Report TR-1999-66, Stanford University,1999.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. F. J. Van Raan, Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3) (2006) 491–502.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Rahm, A. Thor, Citation analysis of database publications. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Rousseau, A case study: Evolution of JASIS’ Hirsch index. Library and Information Science, Jan. 2006. Available at
  33. 33.
    R. Rousseau, Simple models and the corresponding h and g index. Library and Information Science, Apr. 2006. Available at
  34. 34.
    G. Saad, Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. B. Schwartz, M. C. Russo, How to quickly find articles in the top IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 47(2) (2004) 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, A citation-based system to assist prize awarding. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 41(2) (2005) 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, Generalized comparison of graph-based ranking algorithms for publications and authors. Journal for Systems and Software (2006), To appear.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    R. Snodgrass, Journal relevance. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3) (2003) 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonis Sidiropoulos
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Katsaros
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yannis Manolopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatics DepartmentAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Computer & Communications Engineering DepartmentUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations