Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach
- 548 Downloads
Our aim is to compare the coverage of the Scopus database with that of Ulrich, to determine just how homogenous it is in the academic world. The variables taken into account were subject distribution, geographical distribution, distribution by publishers and the language of publication. The analysis of the coverage of a product of this nature should be done in relation to an accepted model, the optimal choice being Ulrich’s Directory, considered the international point of reference for the most comprehensive information on journals published throughout the world. The results described here allow us to draw a profile of Scopus in terms of its coverage by areas — geographic and thematic — and the significance of peer-review in its publications. Both these aspects are highly pragmatic considerations for information retrieval, the evaluation of research, and the design of policies for the use of scientific databases in scientific promotion.
KeywordsCoverage Analysis Percentage Distribution Journal Citation Report Subject Coverage Subject Ranking
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y. (2005), Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities. In: Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI). Karolinska University Press, pp. 149–158.Google Scholar
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2000), How Balanced is the Science Citation Index’s Journal Coverage? A preliminary Overview of Macrolevel Statistical Data. In: Cronin, B., Atkins, H. B. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge — A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Canada: American Society of Information Science, pp. 251–277.Google Scholar
- Codina, L. (2005), Scopus: el mayor navegador científico de la web, El Profesional de la Información, 14: 44–49.Google Scholar
- Deis, L. F., Goodman, D. (2005), Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus, The Charleston Advisor, 6. Text available at: http://www.charlestonco.com/comp.cfm?id=43
- Jacso, P. (2004), Scopus, Péter’s Digital Reference Shelf. September 2004. Text available at: http://www.galegroup.com/servlet/HTMLFileServlet?imprint=9999®ion=7&fileName=reference/archive/200409/scopus.html
- Laguardia, C. (2005), E-views and reviews: Scopus vs. Web of Science. Library Journal, 15. Text available at: http://www.libraryjournal.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA491154
- SCOPUS Info — List of journals. http://www.info.scopus.com/aboutscopus/documents/title_list.xls
- Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory. http://www.ulrichsweb.com