Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 117–144 | Cite as

An analysis of the determinants in Economics and Business publications by Spanish universities between 1994 and 2004

  • Raúl Ramos
  • Vicente Royuela
  • Jordi Suriñach
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study consists, firstly, of quantifying differences between Spanish universities’ output (in terms of publications and citations), and secondly, analysing its determinants. The results obtained show that there are factors which have a positive influence on these indicators, such as having a third-cycle programme, with public financing obtained in competitive selection procedures, having a large number of full-time researchers or involvement in collaborations with international institutions. However, other factors which appear to have the opposite effect were also noted. These include a higher number of students per lecturer or a lower proportion of lecturers with recognised six-year periods.

Keywords

Scientific Production Bibliometric Analysis Social Science Citation Index Bibliometric Study Business Publication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. D., Clemmons, J. R. (2006), The Growing Allocative Inefficiency of the U.S. Higher Education Sector, mimeo. Available at http://www.nber.org/:_sewp/references.html
  2. Bauwens, L., Kirman, A., Lubrano, M., Protopopescu, C. (2000), Some Methodological Aspects for Rankings European Economic Departments a Statistical Approach, mimeo.Google Scholar
  3. Bauwens, L., Kirman, A., Lubrano, M., Protopopescu, C. (2002), Ranking European Economics Departaments: A Statistical Approach, mimeo.Google Scholar
  4. Bergantińos, G., Da Rocha, J. M., Polomé, P. (2002), La investigación espańola en economía 1995–1999, Investigaciones Económicas, XXVI(2), pp. 373–392.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, A., Trivedi, P. (1990), Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson Model, Journal of Econometrics, 46: 347–364.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, B. D. (2005), Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: Uses, abuses, and implications, Libraries and the Academy, 5: 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherchye, L., Vanden Abeele, P. (2005), On research efficiency. A micro analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management, Research Policy, 34: 495–416.Google Scholar
  8. Combes, P., Linnemer, L. (1999), The Publication of Research Papers in France. An Approach Using Citations. CERAS working paper 00-04.Google Scholar
  9. Combes, P., Linnemer, L. (2000), The Publication of Research Papers in France, An Approach Using the Quality of Journals. CERAS working paper 99-13.Google Scholar
  10. Conroy, M., Dusansky, R. (1995), The productivity of economics departments in the US: Publications in core journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 33: 1966–1971.Google Scholar
  11. Coupé, T. (2003), Revealed performances. Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1: 1309–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, J., Huston, J., Moore Patterson, D. (2001), Scholarly output of economists: A description of publishing patterns. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29: 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dusansky, R., Vernon, C. (1998), Rankings of U.S. Economics Departments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 157–170.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003), Studying ourselves: The academic labor market, Journal of Labor Economics, 21: 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faria, J. R. (2001), Rent seeking in academia: The consultancy disease. The American Economist, 45: 69–74.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, K. J., Milbourne, R. (1999), What determines research output of academic economists? Economic Record, 75: 256–267.Google Scholar
  17. Fusfeld, D. R. (1956), The origins of the contributors to the AER during the 50s. American Economic Review, 46: 642–644.Google Scholar
  18. García, P., Lafuente, A., Montañés, A., Sanz, F. (1999a), Producción científica en economía según publicaciones en revistas internacionales: el caso de España. Papeles de Economía Española, 81: 49–57.Google Scholar
  19. García, P., Montañés, A., Sanz, F. (1999b) La investigación en economía en España: Mercado nacional ?versus? Mercado internacional. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 20: 167–187.Google Scholar
  20. Graves, P. E., Marchand, J. R., Thompson, R. (1982), Economics departmental rankings, research incentives, constraints and efficiency, American Economic Review, 72: 1131–1141.Google Scholar
  21. Huettner, D. A., Clark, W. (1997), Comparative research productivity measures for Economics Departments. Journal of Economic Education, 28: 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnes, G. (1988), Determinants of research output in economics departments in British-Universities, Research Policy, 17: 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T., Stengos, T. (2003), Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economics Association, 1: 1346–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T., Savvides, A., Stengos T. (2004), Research spillovers among European and North-American economics departments. Economics of Education Review, 23: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lubrano, M. (2001), Ranking Economic Departments in Belgium, France and Spain: Partial Results from a More General Report. http://durandal.cnrs-mrs.fr/PP/lubrano/rankings/ranking.htm
  26. Martínez Cabrera, M. (2000), Análisis de la eficiencia productiva de las instituciones de educación superior. Papeles de Economía Española, 86: 179–191.Google Scholar
  27. Maske, K. L., Durden, G. C., Gaynor, P. (2003), Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and females economists. Economic Inquiry, 41: 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mein, D. G. (2002), Research productivity and career status. Applied Economics Letters, 9: 809–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moya-Anegon, F. (Ed.) (2005), Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española, FECYT, Madrid.Google Scholar
  30. Sanz, E., García, C., García, A., Modrego A. (1999), La investigación española en Economía a través de las publicaciones nacionales e internacionales en el período 1990–1995. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 20: 113–137.Google Scholar
  31. Sanz Menéndez, L. (1995), Research actors and the state: research evaluation and evaluation of science and technology policies in Spain. Research Evaluation, 5: 79–88.Google Scholar
  32. Sanz Menéndez, L. (2003), La investigación en la universidad española: la financiación competitiva de la investigación, con especial referencia a las Ciencias Sociales y Económicas. Documento de Trabajo Unidad de Políticas Comparadas (CSIC) 03-06.Google Scholar
  33. Spangenbert, J. F. A., Breemhaar, B., Nijhuis, F., Alfenaar, W. (1990a), Some incentives and constraints of scientific performance in Economics. 1. Predictor-criterion relations, Scientometrics, 18: 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spangenbert, J. F. A., Breemhaar, B., Nijhuis, F., Alfenaar, W. (1990b), Some incentives and constraints of scientific performance in Economics. 2. Validity and sensitivity analysis, Scientometrics, 18: 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sutter, M., Kocher, M. (2004), Patterns of co-authorship among economics departments in the USA. Applied Economics, 36: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., Burke, K. G. (2006), Unravelling the academia productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service, Southern Economic Journal, 72: 846–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tombazos, C. G. (2005), A revisionist perspective of European research in Economics. European Economic Review, 49: 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Zimmermann, E. (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology — I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators, International Journal of Management Reviews, 2: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Villar, A. (2003), La evaluación de la investigación en economía. Revista Valenciana de Economía y Hacienda, 8: 97–133.Google Scholar
  40. Wooldridge, J. (1990), Quasi-Likelihood methods for count data, In: Pesaran, H., Schmidt, P. (Eds), Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Volume 2, Blackwell, pp. 352–406.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AQR Research Group — IREAUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations