Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective
While some believe that publication and citation scores are key predictors of breakthroughs in science, others claim that people who work at the intersection of scientific communities are more likely to be familiar with selecting and synthesizing alternatives into novel ideas. This paper contributes to this controversy by presenting a longitudinal comparison of highly creative scientists with equally productive researchers. The sample of creative scientists is identified by combining information on science awards and nominations by international peers covering research accomplishments in the mid-1990s. Results suggest that it is not only the sheer quantity of publications that causes scientists to produce creative pieces of work. Rather, their ability to effectively communicate with otherwise disconnected peers and to address a broader work spectrum also enhances their chances to be widely cited and to develop novel ideas.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Amabile, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
- Borgatti, S., Everett, M., Freeman, L. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis, Analytic Technologies, Natick.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, London.Google Scholar
- Heinze, T. (2006), Die Kopplung von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. Das Beispiel der Nanotechnologie, Campus, Frankfurt/New York.Google Scholar
- Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., Martin, B. R. (Eds) (2004), Creative Knowledge Environments. The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Hollingsworth, R. (2002), Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twenthieth-Century Science: A Case of Excellence in Biomedical Research., WZB Discussion Paper P02-003, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Hollingsworth, R. (2004), Institutionalizing excellence in biomedical research: The case of Rockefeller University. In: D. H. Stapleton (Ed.), Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research. Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University. Rockefeller University Press, pp. 17–63.Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (1999), Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (2004), Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. J. (2003), Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. J., Ohara, L. A., Lubart, T. I. (1997), Creativity as investment, California Management Review, 40: 8–32.Google Scholar
- Weinert, F. E. (2000), Individuelle Kreativität und kollektives Ergebnis, Der Architekt. Zeitschrift des Bundes deutscher Architekten, 48: 24–31.Google Scholar
- Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2ndedition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar