, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 739–758 | Cite as

Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology



Nanotechnology merits having a major impact on the world economy because its applications will be used in virtually all sectors. Scientists, researchers, managers, investors and policy makers worldwide acknowledge this huge potential and have started the nano-race. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the state of the art of nanotechnology from an economic perspective, by presenting data on markets, funding, companies, patents and publications. It will also raise the question of how much of the nano-hype is founded on economic data and how much is based on wishful thinking. It focuses on a comparison between world regions, thereby concentrating on Europe and the European Union in relation to their main competitors — the United States and Japan and the emerging ‘nano-powers’ China and Russia.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anquetil, P. (2005), The Impact of Nanotechnology, Susquehanna Financial Group.Google Scholar
  2. Cientifica (2003), The Nanotechnology Opportunity Report.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission (2004), Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission (2005), Some Figures about Nanotechnology R&D in Europe and Beyond, European Commission, Research DG.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (2005), Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe for 2005 to 2009.Google Scholar
  6. European Council (2002), Presidency Conclusions, Barcelona European Council, 15 and 16 March.Google Scholar
  7. Fecht, H.-J., Ilgner, J., Köhler, T., Mietke, S., Werner, M. (2003), Nanotechnology Market and Company Report — Finding Hidden Pearls, WMtech Center of Excellence Micro and Nanomaterials, Ulm.Google Scholar
  8. Glänzel, W., Meyer, M., du Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, B., Schlemmer, B., Debackere, K., Veugelers, R. (2003), Nanotechnology: Analysis of an Emerging Domain of Scientiifc and Technological Endeavour, Report of Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, K.U. Leuven,
  9. Hullmann, A., Meyer, M. (2003), Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58(3): 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Igami, M. (2006), Bibliometric Indicators of Nanoscience Research, OECD working paper, presented at the NESTI working party, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Lux Research (2004), The Nanotech Report 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Lux Research (2006), Sizing Nanotechnology’s Value Chain.Google Scholar
  13. Mitsubishi Research Institute (2002), cited by Kamei, S., Promoting Japanese-style Nanotechnology Enterprises.Google Scholar
  14. NanoForum (2005), database on www.nanoforum.orgGoogle Scholar
  15. NanoInvestorNews (2005), database on www.nanoinvestornews.comGoogle Scholar
  16. NanoLogue (2005), Engaging with Researchers and Ccivil Society Report from the Nanologue project, www.nanologue.netGoogle Scholar
  17. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2001), cited by RedHerring, The Biotech Boom: The View from Here, online article of 5th November, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Paull, R., Wolfe, J., Hébert, P., Sinkula, M. (2003), Investing in nanotechnology, Nature Biotechnology, 21(10): 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roco M. C. (2003), Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: opportunities for education and training, Nature Biotechnology, 21(10): 1247–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2005), Venture Capital data.Google Scholar
  21. Scheu, M., Veefkind, V., Verbandt, Y., Molina Galan, E., Absalom R., Förster W. (2006), Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach, World Patent Information, 28: 204–211.Google Scholar
  22. Thomson ISI database (2001), on

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European CommissionDG Research Unit “Nano S&T — Convergent Science and Technologies”BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations