Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics

  • 304 Accesses

  • 25 Citations

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a scientometric analysis of nanoscale research in South Africa during the period 2000–2005. The ISI databases were identified as the most appropriate information platform for the objectives of the investigation and have been interrogated for the identification of South African authors publishing in the field.

The article identifies trends over time, major institutional contributors, journals in which South African authors publish their research, international collaborators and performance in comparison to four comparator countries (India, Brazil, South Korea and Australia). The major findings of the investigation are as follows: nanoscale research in South Africa is driven by individual researchers interests up to date and it is in its early stages of development; the country’s nanoscale research is below what would one expect in light of its overall publication output; the country’s nano-research is distributed to a number of Universities with subcritical concentration of researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altmann, J. (2004), Military uses of nanotechnology: Perspectives and concerns, Security Dialogue, 35(1): 61–79.

  2. Braun, T., Schubert, S., Zsindely, S. (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38(2): 321–325.

  3. Dastidar, P. G., Ramachandran, S. (2005), Engineering research in ocean sector: An international profile, Scientometrics, 65(2): 199–213.

  4. DST (2005), National Nanotechnology Strategy, Department of Science and Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.

  5. Guan, J., He, Y. (2005), Comparison and evaluation of domestic and international outputs in Information Science & Technology research in China, Scientometrics, 65(2): 215–244.

  6. Hullmann, A., Meyer, M. (2003), Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58(3): 507–527.

  7. Institute for Scientific Information. (2001), Nanotechnology, ISI Essential Science Indicators, Special Topics, Retrieved November 2005, from http://esi-topics.com/nano.

  8. Ma, N., Guan, J. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 65(3): 343–355.

  9. Macoubrie, J. (2005), Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government, Retrieved December 2005, from www.wilsoncenter.org.

  10. Malsch, I. (1997), Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts’ Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Subareas, Seville, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC.

  11. Meyer, M., Persson, O., Power, Y. (2001). Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data, Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies. Retrieved November 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/era/pdf/nanoexpertgroupreport.pdf.

  12. Pouris, A. (2003), South Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years, South African Journal of Science, 99: 425–428.

  13. Rojo, R., Gomez, I. (2005), Analysis of the Spanish scientific and technological output in the ICT sector, Scientometrics, 66(1): 101–121.

  14. Schummer, J. (2004), Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59(3): 425–465.

  15. Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Yochai, W., Saechiew, M. (2005), An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index: Thailand case study, Scientometrics, 65(3): 293–305.

  16. Sweeney, A. E., Seal, S., Vaidyanathan, P. (2003), The promises and perils of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Exploring emerging social and ethical issues, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4): 236–245.

  17. Weckert, J. (2001), The control of scientific research: The case of nanotechnology, Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 3: 29–44.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Anastassios Pouris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pouris, A. Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics 70, 541–553 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0301-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Science Citation Index Expand
  • Comparator Country
  • South African Journal
  • Information Platform