Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?

Summary

Hirsch (2005) has proposed the h-index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a researcher (Ball, 2005): A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Nph) papers have fewer than h citations each. In a study on committee peer review (Bornmann & Daniel, 2005) we found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Author information

Correspondence to Lutz Bornmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?. Scientometrics 65, 391–392 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Research Fellowship
  • Scientific Output