Hirsch (2005) has proposed the h-index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a researcher (Ball, 2005): A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers have fewer than h citations each. In a study on committee peer review (Bornmann & Daniel, 2005) we found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
About this article
Cite this article
Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?. Scientometrics 65, 391–392 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4
- Research Fellowship
- Scientific Output