Must Evolution Education that Aims at Belief Be Indoctrinating?
Can a teacher aim for students to believe evolution without indoctrinating them? Recent discussions of indoctrination in evolution education suggest that such teaching must inevitably indoctrinate but is “warranted” in some cases; while science educators concerned about teaching for belief argue that such teaching is indoctrinating and is thus to be avoided. In this paper, we consider the argument for the inevitability of indoctrination and for “warranted indoctrination,” argue that the main cost of the latter is the abandonment of the commonly understood negative connotation of “indoctrination,” and offer an account that honors the strengths of that argument but avoids that cost. Assuming that aiming for belief change in students is valuable at least in part because it is more likely than understanding alone to lead to action, we then offer and defend a model of such evolution teaching that is non-indoctrinating and contrast it with two others that are problematically indoctrinating.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Chang, K. (2006). Few biologists but many Evangelicals sign anti-evolution petition. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/21/science/sciencespecial2/21peti.html. Accessed 27 Nov 2019
- Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief & acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Forest, B. (2010). It’s déjà vu all over again: the intelligent design movement’s recycling of creationist strategies. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 170–182.Google Scholar
- Ham, K. (2010). The new answers book 3: over 35 questions on creation/evolution and the Bible. Green Forest: New Leaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ham, K., & Hodge, B. (2014). Inside the Nye Ham debate: revealing truths from the worldview clash of the century. Green Forest: New Leaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kilpatrick, W. H. (1939). Propaganda and indoctrination. The American Teacher, 23, 18–27.Google Scholar
- Laats, A., & Siegel, H. (2016). Teaching evolution in a creation nation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, R., & Cotner, S. (2009). Educational malpractice: the impact of including creationism in high school biology courses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 95–100.Google Scholar
- Schwitzgebel, E. (2015). Belief. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, (Summer 2015 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/belief/, Accessed 5 Jan 2019.
- Scott, E. (1997). Dealing with anti-evolutionism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 17(4), 24–30.Google Scholar
- Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking, and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Siegel, H. (1991). Indoctrination and education. In B. Spiecker & R. Straughan (Eds.), Freedom and indoctrination in education: international perspectives (pp. 30–41). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Siegel, H. (2018). The epistemology of education. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/epistemology-of-education/v-1. Accessed 27 Nov 2019
- Snook, I. A. (1972). Indoctrination and education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Sorell, T. (1991). Scientism: philosophy and the infatuation with science. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar