Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

When Things Go Wrong

Implementing Historical-Investigative Activities in the Classroom

Abstract

In this project, we worked in partnership with school teachers who are frequent users of experimental kits available for loan to schools using the historical-investigative approach. The original kits bring a traditional approach to experimentation, without the presence of the history of science. We developed and implemented new guides to the kits, without changing their materials and instruments. Design-based research supports the development methodology; the school science topics covered in this paper are Joseph Black’s studies on latent and specific heat. Although some of the challenges faced in the implementation of historical-investigative approach are known and well-documented, the present article addresses teachers’ perspectives and some of the problems they faced in the implementation process, most of them related to school and teacher working conditions. Even though this is a case study with a small number of schools and teachers, it is possible to say that there is a huge gap to overcome before the historical-investigative approach can be implemented in large scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    CDCC is a science center linked to the University and has other sectors such as Library, Cineclub, Internet Access Room, Astronomical Observatory and sectors with exhibits about biology, physics, and chemistry. CDCC promotes courses and workshops to students and teachers, exhibitions, scientific and cultural events, movie sessions, and others activities. All these programs annually receive about 65,000 students and visitors.

  2. 2.

    Three teachers abandoned the project along the way.

  3. 3.

    The original and redesigned versions of the guides can be found in http://www.ghtc.usp.br/perfil-de-cibelle-celestino-silva-1.html#instructional-materials

  4. 4.

    For the activities related to specific and latent heat, please see footnote 3.

  5. 5.

    Besides, we emphasize that the partner teachers already used the experimental kits from Experimentoteca, but the results discussed in this paper were obtained with groups that had never been in the laboratory before.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.

  2. Allchin, D. (2014). The episodic historical narrative as a structure to guide inquiry in science and nature of science education. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on History of Science & Science Education (pp. 1–19). Minneapolis, MN.

  3. Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486.

  4. Alves, V. F. (2006). A inserção de atividades experimentais no ensino de Física em nível médio: em busca de melhores resultados de aprendizagem. (Doctoral thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil). Retrieved from Repositório da Universidade de Brasília. (Publication No.10482/8953).

  5. Armstrong, H. E. (1902). The heuristic method of teaching. School Science, 1(8), 395–401.

  6. Barra, V. M., & Lorenz, K. M. (1986). Produção de materiais didáticos de Ciências no Brasil, período: 1950-1980. Ciência e Cultura, 38(12), 1970–1983.

  7. Black, J. (1803). Lectures on the elements of chemistry. Edinburgh: Mundell and son, for Longman and Rees.

  8. Borges, A. T. (2002). Novos rumos para o laboratório escolar de ciências. Caderno Brasileiro do Ensino de Física, 19(3), 291–313.

  9. Cachapuz, A., Gil-Pérez, D., Carvalho, A. M. P., Praia, J., & Vilches, A. (2005). A necessária renovação do ensino das Ciências. São Paulo: Cortez.

  10. Carvalho, A. M. P. (2004). Ensino de ciências: unindo a pesquisa e a prática. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning.

  11. Carvalho, A. M. P. (2006). As práticas experimentais no ensino de Física. In A. M. P. Carvalho (Ed.), Ensino de Física (pp. 53–78). São Paulo: Cengage Learning.

  12. Carvalho, A. M. P. (2013). O ensino de ciências e a proposição de sequências de ensino investigativas. In A. M. P. Carvalho (Ed.), Ensino de ciências por investigação - Condições para implementação na sala de aula (pp. 1–20). Cengage Learning: São Paulo.

  13. Cheung, D. (2008). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107–130.

  14. Chiapetta, E., & Adams, E. (2000). Towards a conception of teaching science and inquiry: the place of content and process. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans.

  15. Clark, R. L., Clough, M. P., & Berg, C. A. (2000). Modifying cookbook labs. The Science Teacher, 67(7), 40–43.

  16. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.

  17. Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770.

  18. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

  19. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath & Company.

  20. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone Rockefeller Center.

  21. Forato, T. C. D. M., Martins, R. D. A., & Pietrocola, M. (2012). History and nature of science in high school: building up parameters to guide educational materials and strategies. Science & Education, 21(5), 657–682.

  22. Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2017). How to conduct a mini-ethnographic case study: a guide for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 22(3), 923–941.

  23. Galamba, A. (2016). Conflicting interpretations of scientific pedagogy. Science & Education, 25(3–4), 363–381.

  24. Gallet, C. (1998). Problem-solving teaching in the chemistry laboratory: leaving the cooks…. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(1), 72–77.

  25. Gonçalves, F. P., & Marques, C. A. (2016). A experimentação na docência de formadores na área de ensino de química. Química Nova na Escola, 38(1), 84–98.

  26. Gooding, J., & Metz, B. (2012). Folding inquiry into cookbook lab activities. Science Scope, 35(8), 42–47.

  27. Gouw, A. M. S., Franzolin, F., & Fejes, M. E. (2013). Desafios enfrentados por professores na implementação de atividades investigativas nas aulas de ciências. Ciência & Educação, 19(2), 439–454.

  28. Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16(2), 141–166.

  29. Heering, P., & Höttecke, D. (2014). Historical-investigative approaches in science teaching. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1473–1502). Holland, Dordrecht: Springer.

  30. Henke, A., & Höttecke, D. (2015). Physics teachers’ challenges in using history and philosophy of science in teaching. Science & Education, 24(4), 349–385.

  31. Henke, A., Höttecke, D., & Riess, F. (2009). Case studies for teaching and learning with History and Philosophy of Science exemplary results of the HIPST project in Germany. Proceedings of the 10th International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (pp. 1–26). University of Notre Dame, South Bend.

  32. HIPST Project (2009). Theoretical basis of the HIPST Project. Available: <http://hipst.eled.auth.gr/>. Accessed 23 Nov 2016

  33. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.

  34. Höttecke, D., & Riess, F. (2009). Developing and implementing case studies for teaching science with the help of history and philosophy. Framework and critical perspectives on ‘HIPST’–European approach for the inclusion of history and philosophy in science teaching. Proceedings of the 10th International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (pp. 1–17). University of Notre Dame, South Bend.

  35. Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: an analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3), 293–316.

  36. Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233–1261.

  37. Kipnis, N. (1996). The ‘historical-investigative’ approach to teaching science. Science & Education, 5(3), 277–292.

  38. Klassen, S., Niaz, M., Metz, D., MCmillan, B., & Dietrich, S. (2012). Portrayal of the history of the photoelectric effect in laboratory instructions. Science & Education, 21(5), 729–743.

  39. Lima, V. A., & Marcondes, M E. R. (2011). O ensino experimental como ferramenta no processo reflexivo dos professores de Química. Paper presented at VIII Encontro nacional de pesquisa em educação em ciências, Atas do VIII ENPEC (pp. 1–12). Campinas.

  40. Lorenz, K. M. (2008). Ação de instituições estrangeiras e nacionais no desenvolvimento de materiais didáticos de ciências no Brasil: 1960-1980. Revista Educação em Questão, 31(17), 7–23.

  41. Lott, K. H. (2011). Fire up the inquiry: lose the routine, tweak your “cookbook lab,” and reach a level of open inquiry with these strategies used during a unit on heat. Science and Children, 48(7), 29–33.

  42. Machado, V. F., & Sasseron, L. H. (2012). As perguntas em aulas investigativas de Ciências: a construção teórica de categorias. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 12(2), 29–44.

  43. Martins, R. A., Silva, C. C., & Prestes, M. E. B. (2014). History and philosophy of science in science education in Brazil. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 2271–2299). Holland, Dordrecht: Springer.

  44. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B. A., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project based science: experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517–538.

  45. Maurines, L., & Beaufils, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science in physics courses: the contribution of classroom historical inquiries. Science & Education, 22(6), 1443–1465.

  46. Pella, M. O. (1969). The laboratory and science teaching. In H. O. Andersen (Ed.), Reading in science education of the secondary school (pp. 233–251). London: The Macmillan Company.

  47. Penuel, W. R. (2017). Research-practice partnerships as a strategy for promoting equitable science teaching and learning through leveraging everyday science. Science Education, 101(4), 520–525.

  48. Peters, E. (2005). Reforming cookbook labs. Science Scope, 29(3), 16–21.

  49. Plummer, J. D., & Ozcelik, A. T. (2015). Preservice teachers developing coherent inquiry investigations in elementary astronomy. Science Education, 99(5), 932–957.

  50. Priestley, W. J., Priestley, H. D., & Schmuckler, J. S. (1997). The impact of longer term intervention on reforming physical science teachers’ approaches to laboratory instruction: seeking a more effective role for laboratory in science education. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Meeting, (pp. 1–9). Chicago.

  51. Rezende, F., Lopes, A. M. A., Egg, J. M. (2003). Problemas da prática pedagógica de professores de física e de matemática da escola pública. Paper presented at IV Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, Atas do IV ENPEC (pp. 1–13). Bauru.

  52. Ruhrig, J., & Höttecke, D. (2015). Components of science teachers’ professional competence and their orientational frameworks when dealing with uncertain evidence in science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 447–465.

  53. Santana, R. S., Locatelli, S. W., Franzolin, F. (2017). Possibilidades e desafios na implementação de atividades investigativas: particularidades docentes. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, Extra(0), 1065–1070.

  54. Sasseron, L. H. (2015). Alfabetização científica, ensino por investigação e argumentação: relações entre ciências da natureza e escola. Revista Ensaio, 17(spe), 49-67.

  55. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3–103). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  56. Tamir, P. (1991). Practical work in school science: an analysis of current practice. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical Science (pp. 13–20). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  57. Trindade, E. C. A., Simoes, B. S., & Custodio, J. F. (2015). Crenças dos alunos de ensino médio em relação à atividade experimental: um estudo inicial. Paper presented at XXI Simpósio Nacional de Ensino de Física, Atas do XXI SNEF (pp. 1-7), Uberlândia.

  58. Viennot, L. (2010). Physics education research and inquiry-based teaching: a question of didactical consistency. In K. Kortland & K. Klaassen (Eds.), Designing theory-based teaching-learning sequences for science education (pp. 37–54). Utrecht: CDBeta Press.

  59. Volkmann, M. J., & Abell, S. K. (2003). Rethinking laboratories: tools for converting cookbook labs into inquiry. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 38–41.

  60. Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283–301.

  61. Yoon, H. G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589–608.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to show our gratitude to our partner teachers and the reviewers’ contributions to the improvement of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Author information

Correspondence to Renata da Fonseca Moraes Batista.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Fonseca Moraes Batista, R., Silva, C.C. When Things Go Wrong. Sci & Educ 28, 1135–1151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00071-z

Download citation