Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 27, Issue 7–8, pp 737–767 | Cite as

The Phenomenon of False Assumption in Historical and Educational Texts

  • Jiří PřibylEmail author
  • Petr Eisenmann
  • Ján Gunčaga
Article

Abstract

This article describes two heuristic strategies for problem solving: the use of false assumption strategy and the use of double false assumption strategy. Both of these strategies have their roots deep in history. In this article, we define these two strategies and illustrate their use in a problem developed by Frances Pellos. The article provides an overview of occurrences of these two strategies in various mathematical and educational texts. The texts show clearly that both of these strategies played a significant role in mathematics education in the past. We present some examples from concrete historical documents, which we use later for the preparation of a teaching experiment. We also present the conclusions of an experiment conducted on three lower secondary schools in the Czech Republic, the goal of which was to test the applicability of the use of false assumption strategy as a propaedeutic to solving word problems using equations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported by Scientific Grant Agency VEGA project 1/0440/15 Geometric conceptions and misconceptions of pre-school and school age children and Czech Science Foundation project P407/12/1939 Development of culture of problem solving in mathematics in Czech schools.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams, D. (1824). The Scholar’s arithmetic; or, federal accountant. New York: Keene, N.H.Google Scholar
  2. Baltzer, R. (1874). Dra Richarda Baltzera základové matematiky: Díl prvý: Prostá arithmetika, obecná arithmetika, algebra. Prague: Nakladatel Theodor Mourek.Google Scholar
  3. Bednarz, N., & Dufour-Janvier, B. (1994). The emergence and development of algebra in a problem-solving context: A problem analysis. In J. P. da Ponte, & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. II. Paper presented at International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lisbon (pp. 64–71). Lisbon: PT, IG for PME.Google Scholar
  4. Bháskarácháryya. (1967). Lílávatí. Engl. transl. by H. T. Colebrooke with notes by H. Ch. Banerji. Allahabad: Kitab Mahal.Google Scholar
  5. Boncompagni, B. (1857). Scritti di Leonardo Pisano matematico del secolo decimoterzo: Volume I. Roma: Tipografia delle scienze matematiche e fisiche.Google Scholar
  6. Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  7. Bonnycastle, J., Rowbotham, J., & Maynard, S. (1851). Bonnycastle’s scholar’s guide to arithmetic; or, a complete exercise book for the use of schools. With notes, containing the reason of every rule, deduced from the most simple and evident principles; together with some of the most useful properties of numbers, and such other particulars as are calculated to elucidate the more abstruse and interesting parts of the science. London: Longman and Co.Google Scholar
  8. Brahmegupta, & Bháskara. (1817). Algebra, with arithmetic and mensuration from the sanscrit. Engl. transl. By H. T. Colebrooke. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Bunt, L. N. H., Jones, P. S., & Bedient, J. D. (1978). The historical roots of elementary mathematics. New York: Dover Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  10. Cajori, F. (1890). The teaching and history of mathematics in the United States. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Chabert, J.-L. (Ed.). (1999). A history of algorithms: From the pebble to the microchip. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Chace, A. B., Bull, L., & Manning, H. P. (1929). The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus: British Museum 10057 and 10058: Photographic facsimile, hieroglyphic transcription, transliteration, literal translation, free translation, mathematical commentary, and bibliography in two volumes. Oberlin: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  13. Clavius, CH. (1585). Christophori Clavii Bambergensis e societate Jesu Epitome Arithmeticae: Practicae nunc denuo ab ipso auctore recognita. Romae.Google Scholar
  14. Daboll, N. (1813). Daboll’s Schoolmaster’s assistant: Improved and enlarged. Albany: E. & E. Hosford.Google Scholar
  15. Dilworth, T. (1825). The Schoolmaster’s assistant, being a compendium of arithmetic, both practical and theoretical in five parts. New York: J. F. Sibell.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenmann, P., Novotná, J., Přibyl, J., & Břehovský, J. (2015). The development of a culture of problem solving with secondary students through heuristic strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: from phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 631–654). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Goodson-Epsy, T. (1998). The role of reification and reflective abstraction in the development of abstract thought: Transitions from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeřábek, J., Lisnerová, R., Smejkalová, A., & Tupý, J. (Eds.). (2013). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání: (verze platná od 1. 9. 2013) úplné znění upraveného RVP ZV. Prague: MŠMT.Google Scholar
  20. Jess, Z. (1824). The American Tutor's Assistant Revised ; or, A Compendious System of Practical Arithmetic ; Containing the Several Rules of that Useful Science, Concisely Defined, Methodically Arranged, and Fully Exemplified. The Whole Particularly Adapted to the Easy and Regular Instruction of Youth in our American Schools. Philadelphia: Joseph Crukshank.Google Scholar
  21. Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. H. M. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 2481–2502.Google Scholar
  22. Keith, T. (1822). The complete practical arithmetician: Containing several new and useful improvements adapted to the use of schools and private tuition. London: G. & W. B. Whittaker.Google Scholar
  23. Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: a study of two grade seven classes. Final report. Bloomington: School of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monroe, W. S. (1912). A chapter in the development of arithmetic teaching in the United States [continued]. Elementary School Teacher, 13, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morin, L.L., Silvana M.R.W., Hester, P., & Raver, S. (2017). The use of a bar model drawing to teach word problem solving to students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc..Google Scholar
  29. Pike, N., & Leavitt, D. (1826). Pike’s system of arithmetick abridged: Designed to facilitate the study of the science of numbers. Concord: Jacob B. Moore.Google Scholar
  30. Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving. Combined edition. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Pólya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Expanded Princeton Science Library ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem solving. East Sussex: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schack-Schackenburg, H. (1900). Der Berliner Papyrus 6619. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische sprache und altertumskunde, XXXVIII, 135–140.Google Scholar
  35. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1981). Episodes and Executive Decisions in Mathematical Problem Solving. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED201505
  36. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. London: Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd..Google Scholar
  37. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. J Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sigler, L. E. (2003). Fibonacci’s liber abaci: A translation into modern English of Leonardo Pisano’s book of calculation. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (2000). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (Eds.). (1996). The nature of mathematical thinking. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
  41. Tao, T. (2006). Solving mathematical problems: A personal perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). How to solve mathematical problems. New York: Dover Publications Inc..Google Scholar
  43. Zeitz, P. (2007). The art and craft of problem solving. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of Jan Evangelista Purkyně in Ústí nad LabemÚstí nad LabemCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Science Education, Faculty of EducationComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations