Barry J. Fraser, Kenneth G. Tobin and Campbell J. McRobbie (eds): Second International Handbook of Science Education
The Second International Handbook of Science Education (henceforth The Handbook) is, like its predecessor (Fraser and Tobin 1998), published in two volumes. Each of these volumes amounts to over 700 pages of text making even the separate volumes quite substantial tomes. The two volumes contain 96 chapters, organised into eleven sections (or ‘Parts’, listed below). The Handbook is international both in the sense of being aimed at the international field, and in terms of its authorship. The editors report that 170 authors from 20 countries were involved in the production of the book. That there is particularly high representation of authors based in North America, Australasia and Europe is probably a reasonable reflection of the current state of the field of science education. Perhaps if a third edition is published in 2026 or so, we will see more chapters written by authors working in Universities in Asia, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.
The language of The Handbookis...
- Bachelard, G. (1940/1968). The Philosophy of No: A philosophy of the scientific mind. New York: Orion Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, B. (1964). Elaborated and restricted codes: Their social origins and some consequences. American Anthropologist, 66(6_PART2) (pp. 55–69). doi: 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00030.
- Bloom, B. S. (1968). The cognitive domain. In L. H. Clark (Ed.), Strategies and tactics in secondary school teaching: A book of readings (pp. 49–55). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Cray, D., Dawkins, R., & Collins, F. (2006). God vs. science. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1555132,00.html.
- Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. G. (Eds.). (1998). International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture the interpretation of cultures: selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (2014). Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Millar, R. (2003). Teaching about energy. In Key Stage 3 National Strategy (Ed.), Strengthening teaching and learning of energy in Key Stage 3 science: Notes for tutors (pp. 161–179). No place of publication given: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences, & Institute of Medicine. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Piantanida, M., & Garman, N. B. (2009). The qualitative dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An evolutionary approach (Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Constinuum.Google Scholar
- Smardon, R. (2009). Sociocultural and cultural–historical frameworks for science education. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in North America (pp. 15–25). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy—in school and society. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Solomon, J. (2000). The changing perspectives of constructivism: science wars and children’s creativity. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 283–307). Chicago, Illinois: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
- Taber, K. S. (2007). An agenda for science education for gifted learners. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 212–216). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1994). The development of academic concepts in school aged children. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 355–370). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar