Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 673–694 | Cite as

Carl Linnaeus, Erasmus Darwin and Anna Seward: Botanical Poetry and Female Education

  • Sam George
Article

Abstract

This article will explore the intersection between ‘literature’ and ‘science’ in one key area, the botanical poem with scientific notes. It reveals significant aspects of the way knowledge was gendered in the Enlightenment, which is relevant to the present-day education of girls in science. It aims to illustrate how members of the Lichfield Botanical Society (headed by Erasmus Darwin) became implicated in debates around the education of women in Linnaean botany. The Society’s translations from Linnaeus inspired a new genre of women’s educational writing, the botanical poem with scientific notes, which emerged at this time. It focuses in particular on a poem by Anna Seward and argues that significant problems regarding the representation of the Linnaean sexual system of botany are found in such works and that women in the culture of botany struggled to give voice to a subject which was judged improper for female education. The story of this unique poem and the surrounding controversies can teach us much about how gender impacted upon women’s scientific writing in eighteenth century Britain, and how it shaped the language and terminology of botany in works for female education. In particular, it demonstrates how the sexuality of plants uncovered by Linnaeus is a paradigmatic illustration of how societal forces can simultaneously both constrict and stimulate women’s involvement in science. Despite the vast changes to women’s access in scientific knowledge of the present day, this ‘fair sexing’ of botany illustrates the struggle that women have undergone to give voice to their botanical knowledge.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Scarlet Fever Sexual System Female Education Botanical Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. A Botanical Society at Lichfield, Preface of the Translators (1783). In: Linnaeus, C. [Carl von Linné]. A system of vegetables, according to their classes, genera, orders, species with their characters and differences, 2 vols. Lichfield: Printed by John Jackson for Leigh and Sotherby […] London. Vol. 1, p. ii.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, D. E. (1976). The naturalist in Britain: A social history. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, C. (1771). A dissertation on the sexes of plants [1754]. In Essays and observations, physical and literary, 2nd Edn. 3 vols. Edinburgh: Printed for John Balfour, vol. 1, p. 266.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmun, M. (1931). The singing swan. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barbauld, A. L., & Aikin, J. (1792–1796). Evenings at home; or, The Juvenile budget opened. Consisting of a variety of miscellaneous pieces, for the instruction and amusement of young persons, 6 vols. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  6. Bewell, A. (1989). Jacobin plants: Botany as social theory in the 1790s. Wordsworth Circle, 20, 132–139.Google Scholar
  7. Bewell, A. (1996). ‘On the Banks of the South Sea’: Botany and sexual controversy in the late eighteenth century. In D. P. Miller & P. H. Reill (Eds.), Visions of empire: Voyages, botany and representations of nature (pp. 132–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blunt, W. (1971). The compleat naturalist: A life of Linnaeus. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Blunt, W., & Stearn, W. T. (1995). The art of botanical illustration. London: Antique Collectors’ Club.Google Scholar
  10. Bora, L. (2010). Principles of paleobotany. New Delhi: International Scientific Publishing Academy.Google Scholar
  11. Brewer, J. (1997). ‘Queen Muse of Britain’: Anna Seward of Lichfield and the Literary Provinces. The pleasures of the imagination: English culture in the eighteenth century (pp. 573–612). London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Britten, J. (1917). Mrs Moriarty’s Viridarium. Journal of Botany, 55, 52–54.Google Scholar
  13. Browne, J. (1989). Botany for gentleman: Erasmus Darwin and The Loves of the Plants. ISIS: Journal of the History of Science Society, 80(304), 593–621.Google Scholar
  14. Browne, J. (1996). Botany in the Boudoir and Garden: The Banksian context. In D. P. Miller & P. H. Reill (Eds.), Visions of empire: Voyages, botany and representations of nature (pp. 153–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Colley, L. (1996). Britons: forging the nation 1707–1837. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Cook, G. C. (1993). Erasmus Darwin and the foxglove controversy. London: Royal Society of Medicine.Google Scholar
  17. Curran, S. (1993). Women readers, women writers. In Stuart Curren (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to British romanticism (pp. 177–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darwin, E. (1797). A plan for the conduct of female education in boarding schools. Derby: Printed by J. Drewry for J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  19. Darwin, E. (1973). The loves of the plants. In: The botanic garden: A poem in two parts. Part I containing the economy of vegetation, Part II the loves of plants, with philosophic notes. London: J. Johnson, 1791; repr. Menston, Scolar Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frängsmyr, T. (Ed.). (1983). Linnaeus: The man and the work. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fulford, T. (1997). Coleridge, Darwin, Linnaeus: The sexual politics of botany. Wordsworth Circle, 28(3), 124–130.Google Scholar
  22. George, S. (2007). Botany, sexuality and women’s writing: 1760–1830: From modest shoot to forward plant. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. (Thomas Burger & Frederick Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hagberg, K. (1952). Carl Linnaeus. (Alan Blair, Trans.). London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  25. Henry, B. (1975). British botanical and horticultural literature before 1800 (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jacson, M. E. (1797). Botanical dialogues between Hortensia and her four children, Charles, Harriet, Juliette and Henry designed for the use in schools by a lady. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  27. Jacson, M. E. (1804). Advertisement. October 1803. Botanical lectures by a lady, altered from ‘Botanical Dialogues For the Use of Schools’ by the same author. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  28. Joseph Pitton de (1694) Elémens de botanique, ou methode pour connoître les plantes (Vol. 3). Paris: [n. pub.].Google Scholar
  29. Kelly, J. (1999). Introduction. In: Gary Kelly, et al. (Eds.), Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking Circle, 17381790. 6 vols. London: Chatto & Pickering. Vol. 4: Anna Seward, ed. Jennifer Kelly, pp. ix–xxi.Google Scholar
  30. Koerner, L. (1999). Linnaeus: Nature and nation. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lindroth, S. (1983). The two faces of Linnaeus. In Tore Frangsmyr (Ed.), Linnaeus: The man and the work (pp. 1–62). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Linnaeus, C. [Carl von Linné]. (1783). A system of vegetables, according to their classes, genera, orders, species with their characters and differences […] Translated from the Thirteenth Edition of the Systema Vegetabilium of the Late Professor Linnaeus and from the Supplementum Plantarum of the Present Professor Linnaeus […] By A Botanical Society at Lichfield. 2 vols. Lichfield: printed by John Jackson for Leigh and Sotherby […] London.Google Scholar
  33. Linnaeus, C. [Carl von Linné]. (1957). Vita Caroli Linnaei. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  34. Lucas, E. V. (1907). A swan and her friends. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  35. Maniquis, R. M. (1969). The puzzling mimosa: Sensitivity and plant symbols in romanticism. Studies in Romanticism, 8(3), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, D. P., & Reill, P. H. (Eds.). (1996). Visions of empire: Voyages, botany and representations of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Moriarty, H. M. (1806). A Viridarium. London: [n. pub.].Google Scholar
  38. Moriarty, H. M. (1807). Fifty plates of green-house plants, drawn and coloured from nature with precise descriptions, and rules for their culture. Intended also for the improvement of young ladies in the art of drawing. London: T. Bensley.Google Scholar
  39. Morton, A. G. (1981). History of botanical science: an account of the development of botany from ancient times to the present day. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pascoe, J. (1994). Female botanists and the poetry of Charlotte Smith. In Carol Shiner Wilson & Joel Haefner (Eds.), Re-visioning romanticism (pp. 193–209). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pearson, H. (Ed.). (1936). The swan of Lichfield. Being a selection from the correspondence of Anna Seward, with a short biography and preface. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  42. Perry, J. (1779). Mimosa: Or, the sensitive plant: A poem dedicated to Mr. Banks and addressed to Kitt Frederick, Duchess of Queensbury, Elect. London: Printed for W. Sandwich.Google Scholar
  43. Polwhele, R. (1974). The Unsex’d females. London: Cadell and Davies, 1798; repr. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, S. (1887). Recollections of the table talk of Samuel Rogers. Ed. Rev. Alexander Dyce. New Southgate: H. A. Rogers.Google Scholar
  46. Rousseau, J–J. (1787). Letters on the elements of botany addressed to a lady. By the celebrated J.J. Rousseau, Translated into English With Notes and Twenty-Four Additional Letters, Fully Explaining the System of Linnaeus, By Thomas Martyn, B.D. F.R.S. Professor of Botany in the University of Cambridge. 2nd edn. London: Printed for B. White & Son.Google Scholar
  47. Rowden, F. A. (1801). A poetical introduction to the study of botany. London: T. Bensley.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, C. A. (1983). Science and social change 1700–1900. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Schiebinger, L. (1991). The private life of plants: Sexual politics in Carl Linnaeus and Erasmus Darwin. In Marina Benjamin (Ed.), Science and sensibility: Gender and scientific enquiry 1780–1945 (pp. 121–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schiebinger, L. (1993). Nature’s body: Sexual politics and the making of modern science. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  51. Schofield, R. (1962). The lunar society at Birmingham: A social history of provincial science and industry in eighteenth-century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Seward, A. (1783). ‘The Backwardness of Spring Accounted For’, in Linnaeus, A System of Vegetables […] Translated from the Thirteenth Edition of the Systema Vegetabilium of the Late Professor Linnaeus and from the Supplementum Plantarum of the Present Professor Linnaeus […] By A Botanical Society at Lichfield, 2 vols. Lichfield: printed by John Jackson for Leigh and Sotherby, ii, manuscript in endpapers (British Library, 447.c.18).Google Scholar
  53. Seward, A. (1804). Memoirs of the life of Dr. Darwin: Chiefly during his residence at Lichfield, with anecdotes of his friends and criticisms on his writings by Anna Seward. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  54. Shteir, A. (1996). Cultivating women, cultivating science: Flora’s daughters and botany in England, 1760–1860. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, C. (1804). Conversations introducing poetry chiefly on the subject of natural history for the use of children and young persons (Vol. 2). London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  56. Stafford, B. (1984). Voyage into substance: art, science, nature and the illustrated travel account, 1760–1840. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stafleu, F. (1971). Linnaeus and the Linnaeans: The spreading of their ideas in systematic botany 1735–1789. Utrecht: Oosthoek’s Uitgeversmaatschappis N.V. for the International Society of Plant Taxonomy.Google Scholar
  58. Stearn, W. T. (1955). Linnaeus’s ‘Species Plantarum’ and the language of botany. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London, 165(Part 2), 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stearn, W. T. (1957–1959). Preface. In: Carl Linnaeus, Species Plantarum. 2 vols. Uppsala: 1753; facs. repr. London: Printed for Ray Society, Sold by B. Quaritch.Google Scholar
  60. Stearn, W. T. (1958). Carl Linnaeus: Classifier and namer of living things. New Scientist, 4, 401–403.Google Scholar
  61. Stearn, W. T. (1962). The origin of the male and female symbols of biology. Taxon, 11(4), 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson, E. P. (1980). The making of the English working class (New ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  63. Tobin, B. Fowkes. (1996). Imperial designs, botanical illustration and the British Empire. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 25, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uglow, J. (2002). The Lunar men: Five friends who made the future: 1730–1810. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  65. Wakefield, P. (1796). An Introduction to Botany in a Series of Familiar Letters. Dublin: Printed by Thomas Burnside. For Messrs P. Wogan, P. Byrne, J. Milliken, J. Rice, B. Dugdale, J. Gough, P. Moore and George Johnston.Google Scholar
  66. Wakefield, P. (1818). An introduction to botany in a series of familiar letters (8th ed.). London: Darton, Harvey.Google Scholar
  67. White, D. E. (1999). The Joineriana: Anna Laetitia Barbauld, the Aikin family circle and the dissenting public sphere. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 32(4), 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Withering, W. (1776). A botanical arrangement of all vegetables naturally growing in Great Britain (2 vols). Birmingham: Printed by M. Swinney, for T. Cadell and P. Elmsley in the Strand, and G. Robinson in Pater-noster-row, London.Google Scholar
  69. Withering, W. (1796). An arrangement of british plants, according to the latest improvements of the Linnaean system to which is prefixed an easy introduction to the study of botany. Illustrated By Copper Plates By William (3rd Edn. 4 vols). Birmingham: Printed by M. Swinney for G. G. & J. Robinson, and B. & J. White, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations