Abstract
This article introduces the justification problem for mathematics, which it explores through the case study of 1820s–1840s rationales for the teaching of mathematics to women in the United States. It argues that, while educators in the 1820s justified women’s studies through mental discipline (a common reason for men’s study), those of the 1830s–1840s increasingly relied on separate, gendered justifications, tied to emerging ideals of middle-class femininity. This article therefore emphasizes the contingency of the justification problem, which serves to break the present-day cycle of gender stereotypes regarding mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanian. (1821). Waterford Female Academy. Albany Gazette, 23 January.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Barnard, H. (1841). Report of the secretary of the board. Connecticut Common School Journal, 3, 242–252.
Bledstein, B. (1976). Culture of professionalism: The middle class and the development of education in America. New York, NY: Norton.
Cohen, P. C. (1982). A calculating people: The spread of numeracy in early America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, P. C. (2003). Numeracy in nineteenth-century America. In G. M. A. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), A history of school mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 43–76). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Day, J. (1814). An introduction to algebra, being the first part of a course of mathematics, adapted to the method of instruction in the American colleges. New Haven, CN: Howe & Deforest.
Day, J., & Kingsley, J. L. (1829). Original papers in relation to a course of liberal education. American Journal of Science and Arts, 15, 297–351.
DeBare, I. (2004). Where girls come first: The rise, fall, and surprising revival of girls’ schools. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Dewitt, G.A., & Kingsbury, J. (1828). Providence High School. Reprinted in American Journal of Education, 3, 427–429.
Ellerton, N., & Clements, M. A. K. (2012). Rewriting the history of school mathematics in North America 1607–1861: The central role of cyphering books. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Ernest, P. (1998). Why teach mathematics? The justification problem in mathematics education. In J. H. Jensen, M. Niss & T. Wedege (Eds.), Justification and enrolment problems in education involving mathematics or physics (pp. 33–55). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Fenner, M. S., & Fishburn, E. C. (1944). Pioneer American educators. Washington, DC: Hugh Birch-Horace Mann Fund of the National Education Association.
Fishburn, J. (1828). Some remarks on education, textbooks, etc. Portland, ME: Shirley & Hyde.
Foster, J. (1824). A sketch of the tour of General Lafayette, on his late visit to the United States, 1824; comprising the addresses of the town and city authorities, with the answers of the general; annexed to which, are biographical notices of his life: Together with the most approved specimens of poetry, addressed to him on his arrival. Portland, ME: A.W. Thayer.
Fowler, H. (1859). Educational services of Mrs. Emma Willard. The American Journal of Education, 6, 125–168.
Goodsell, W. (1931). Pioneers of women’s education in the United States: Emma Willard, Catharine Beecher, Mary Lyon. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Guralnick, S. M. (1975). Science and the ante-bellum American college. Philadelphia, PA: The American Philosophical Society.
Hale, S.J. (1838). Editor’s table. The Lady’s Book, 17, 283–287.
Hopkins, M. (1847). Miscellaneous essays and discourses. Boston, MA: T.R. Marvin.
Irving, J. T. (1826). Address delivered on the opening of the New-York high-school for females. New York, NY: William A. Mercein.
Jensen, J. H., Niss, M., & Wedege, T. (1998). Justification and enrolment problems in education involving mathematics or physics. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Jørgensen, B. C. (1998). Mathematics and physics education in society: The justification and enrolment problems from a general perspective. In J. H. Jensen, M. Niss & T. Wedege (Eds.), Justification and enrolment problems in education involving mathematics or physics (pp. 15–32). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Kidwell, P. A., Ackerberg-Hastings, A., & Roberts, D. L. (2008). Tools of American mathematics teaching, 1800–2000. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Kohlstedt, S. G. (1990). Parlors, primers, and public schooling: Education for science in nineteenth-century America. Isis, 81, 424–445.
Larcom, L. (1889). A New England girlhood, outlined from memory. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.
Locke, J. (1706). Posthumous works of Mr. John Locke. London: Printed by W.B. for A. and J. Churchill at the Black Swan in Pater-Noster-Row.
Lutz, A. (1964). Emma Willard: Pioneer educator of American women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Marks, E. (1828). Hints on female education, with an outline of an institution for the education of females, termed the So. Ca. female institute; under the direction of Dr. Elias Marks. Columbia, SC: David W. Sims.
Matthews, J. M. (1841). Report on a course of study for females. In Transactions of the ninth and tenth annual meetings of the Western literary institute and college of professional teachers, held in Cincinnati, October, 1839, and October, 1840 (pp. 169–177). Cincinnati, OH: Kendall & Barnard.
McKeen, P., & McKeen, P. F. (1880). A history of Abbot Academy, Andover, Mass., 1829–1879. Andover, MA: Warren F. Draper.
Melder, K. E. (1972). Woman’s high calling: The teaching profession in America, 1830–1860. American Studies, 13, 19–32.
Monaghan, E. J. (2005). Learning to read and write in colonial America. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Murray, B. (1995). Gender gap in math scores is closing. APA Monitor, 26, 43.
Nash, M. A. (2005). Women’s education in the United States, 1780–1840. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1970). A history of mathematics education in the United States and Canada, thirty-second yearbook. Washington, DC: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Phelps, A. H. L. (1836). The female student; or, lectures to young ladies on female education. For the use of mothers, teachers, and pupils. Boston, MA: Crocker & Brewster.
Poirier, J. M., Tanenbaum, C., Storey, C., Kirshstein, R., & Rodriguez, C. (2009). The road to the STEM professoriate for underrepresented minorities: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Roberts, D. L. (2001). E.H. Moore’s early-twentieth-century program for reform in mathematics education. The American Mathematical Monthly, 108, 689–696.
Scott, A. F. (1979). The ever widening circle: The diffusion of feminist value from the Troy female seminary, 1822–1872. History of Education Quarterly, 19, 3–25.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.
SFW. (1834). Female education. The American Ladies’ Magazine, 7, 499–502.
Sklar, K. K. (1973). Catharine Beecher: A study in American domesticity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, M. J. T. (2014). GPS for graduate school: Students share their stories. Purdue, IN: Purdue University Press.
Tolley, K. (2003). The science education of American girls: A historical perspective. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Warner, D. J. (1978). Science education for women in antebellum America. Isis, 69, 58–67.
Woloch, N. (2000). Women and the American experience (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Woody, T. (1929). A history of women’s education in the United States. New York, NY: The Science Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fiss, A. Cultivating Parabolas in the Parlor Garden: Reconciling Mathematics Education and Feminine Ideals in Nineteenth-Century America. Sci & Educ 23, 241–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9638-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9638-x