Eco-Driven Chemical Research in the Boundary Between Academia and Industry
- 234 Downloads
This paper examines and discusses the views on science and society held among PhD students working in two different industrially and environmentally driven research programmes in the broad area of green chemistry. It is based on thirteen in-depth interviews. The analysis shows three main ways of handling the situation as “post-academic” PhD student: (1) the student sees the PhD work mainly as a job and does not reflect about his/her research or the research funding, (2) the student is satisfied with the post-academic situation, accepts the established innovation policy discourse and is sceptical to traditional academic research, and (3) the student sees collaborative research programmes as a way to get funding, which can be used for secretly done basic research. Most PhD students either emphasise usefulness—in line with the dominating research policy discourse—or they adopt the positivistic view of science as objective and independent of the surrounding society. However, there are only a few signs of “double problematisation”, that is a critical view where both disciplinary-oriented and industry-dependent research are problematised.
KeywordsCritical Thinking Academic Freedom Financial Type Ecological Modernisation Industry Collaboration
Valuable comments from the anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, Mikael Klintman and Mats Benner at the Research Policy Institute, Lund University and Lena Hansson at Kristianstad University are acknowledged for valuable comments on previous drafts of the manuscript. Financial support from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) is also gratefully acknowledged.
- Aikenhead, G. (1997). Exploring ideologies: STS and HPS. Paper presented at the “HPS, STS, and the goals of school science” symposium at the History & Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching conference, Calgary, Canada, 21–24 June 1997.Google Scholar
- Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life—Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Böschen, S., Lenoir, D., & Scheringer, M. (2003). Sustainable chemistry: Starting points and prospects. Naturwissenschaften, 90(3), 93–102.Google Scholar
- Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Clavert, J. (2000). Is there a role for’basic research’ in Mode 2? VEST: tidskrift för vetenskaps- och teknikstudier, 13(3–4), 35–51.Google Scholar
- Coppola, B. P. (2001). The technology transfer dilemma. HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7, 155–167.Google Scholar
- Fuller, S. (2002). Knowledge management foundations. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge—The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Invitation text for the conference: “Scientific Advice: The difficult partnership of environmental politics and science”. (2003). Held in Oslo, Norway, 28–30 November 2003. Among the speakers were Fuller, S., & Elzinga A. http://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/forskning/seminarer/vitenskapsteori/gamle-sider/2003-h/Advice.html. Accessed February 27, 2006.
- Kovac, J. (2001). Gifts and commodities in chemistry. HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7, 141–153.Google Scholar
- Sjöström, J. (2007). The discourse of chemistry (and beyond). HYLE—International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 13(2), 83–97.Google Scholar
- Sjöström, J. (2011). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education. doi: 10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0. Published online: October 25, 2011.
- Sörlin, S. (2005). Stärkt konkurrenskraft? In S. Sörlin (Ed.), “I den absoluta frontlinjen”—En bok om forskningsstiftelserna, konkurrenskraften och politikens möjligheter. Sweden: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa. (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Stenmark, M. (2004). How to relate science and religion—A multidimensional model. Cambridge: Wiliam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant—Basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Ziman, J. (1996). ‘Postacademic science’: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9(1), 67–80.Google Scholar