Regulatory Evolution and Theoretical Arguments in Evolutionary Biology
- First Online:
The cis-regulatory hypothesis is one of the most important claims of evolutionary developmental biology. In this paper I examine the theoretical argument for cis-regulatory evolution and its role within evolutionary theorizing. I show that, although the argument has some weaknesses, it acts as a useful example for the importance of current scientific debates for science education.
- Braga, M., Guerra, A., & Reis, J. C. (2010). The role of historical-philosophical controversies in teaching sciences: The debate between biot and ampere. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9312-5.
- Brigandt, I. (2011). Explanation in biology: Reduction, pluralism, and explanatory aims. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9350-7 .
- Carroll, S. B. (2005a). Evolution at two levels: On genes and form. PLoS Biology, 3, 1159–1166.Google Scholar
- Carroll, S. B. (2005b). Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo-devo. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Carroll, S. B. (2006). The making of the fittest: DNA and the ultimate forensic record of evolution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Carroll, S. B., Grenier, J. K., & Weatherbee, S. D. (2001). From DNA to diversity: Molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1872). On the origin of species by means of natural selection (6th ed.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Davidson, E. H. (2001). Genomic regulatory systems. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gould, S. J. (1983). The hardening of the synthesis. In M. Grene (Ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism (pp. 71–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, M. W., & Gerhart, J. C. (2005). The plausibility of life: Resolving Darwin’s dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Laubichler, M. D., & Maienschein, J. (2007). From embryology to Evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lewontin, R. C. (2000). What population geneticists know and how they know it. In R. Creath & J. Maienschein (Eds.), Biology and epistemology (pp. 191–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews, 8, 943–949.Google Scholar
- Paraskevopoulou, E., & Koliopoulos, D. (2010). Teaching the nature of science through the millikan-ehrenhaft dispute. Science & Education. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9308-1.
- Sansom, R., & Brandon, R. N. (Eds.). (2000). Integrating evolution and development: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stern, D. L. (2000). Perspective: Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution, 54, 1079–1091.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar