Science & Education

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 813–826 | Cite as

D. Carlos de Bragança, a Pioneer of Experimental Marine Oceanography: Filling the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Education

Article

Abstract

The activities presented in this paper are part of a wider project that investigates the effects of infusing the history of science in science teaching, toward students’ learning and attitude. Focused on the work of D. Carlos de Bragança, King of Portugal from 1889 to 1908, and a pioneer oceanographer, the activities are addressed at the secondary Biology curriculum (grade 10, ages 15, 16). The proposed activities include a pre-visit orientation task, two workshops performed in a science museum and a follow-up learning task. In class, students have to analyse original historical excerpts of the king’s work, in order to discuss and reflect about the nature of science. In the museum, students actively participate in two workshops: biological classification and specimen drawing. All students considered the project relevant for science learning, stating that it was important not only for knowledge acquisition but also for the understanding of the nature of science. As a final remark we stress the importance of creating activities informed by the history of science as a foundation for improving motivation, sustaining effective science teaching and meaningful science learning, and as a vehicle to promote a closer partnership between schools and science museums.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People. Places and pursuits. Committee on learning science in informal environments, national research council. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bybee, R. W., Powell, J. C., Ellis, J. D., Giese, J. R., Parisi, L., & Singleton, L. (1991). Integrating the history and nature of science and technology in science and social studies curriculum. Science Education, 75, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chagas, I. (1993). Aprendizagem Não-Formal/Formal das Ciências. Relações entre os Museus de Ciência e as Escolas. Revista de Educação, 3(1), 51–59.Google Scholar
  5. Chin, C.-C. (2004). Museum experience—a resource for science teacher education. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 2, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Braganca, C. (1957). Campanha oceanographica de 1897 do yacht amelia. Lisbon: Marinha Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  7. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need quest. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duschl, R. A. (1997). Renovar la enseñanza de las ciencias. Madrid: Nancea.Google Scholar
  11. Duschl, R. A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborn (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 187–206). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitors experiences and their making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  13. Galvão, C., & Abrantes, P. (2005). Physical and natural sciences–a new curriculum in portugal. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant. Context based learning of science (pp. 175–194). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88(Suppl.1), S59–S70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hurd, P. (1997). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kafai, Y. B., & Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (2001). The use of historical materials in elementary science classrooms. Science Education, 85(4), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kisiel, J. (2006). An examination of fieldtrip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education, 90, 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1963). The history of science cases for high school in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kubota, C., & Olstad, R. (1991). Effects of novelty-reducing preparation on exploratory behavior and cognitive learning in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lombardi, O. I. (1997). La pertinência de la historia en la enseñanza de ciencias: Argumentos y contraargumentos. Enseñanza de las Ciências, 15(3), 343–349.Google Scholar
  28. MacDonald, D. (1996). Making both the nature of science and science subject matter explicit intents in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacLeod, B., & Keistead, M. (1990). Museums and schools: Partnership in education. Museum Quarterly, 18(3), 17–22.Google Scholar
  30. Matthews, M. R. (1990). A role for history and philosophy of science in science teaching. Interchange, 20(2), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Kings College.Google Scholar
  34. Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1389–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pereira, A. I., & Amador, F. (2007). A história da ciência em manuais escolares de ciências da natureza. Revista Electrón Enseñanza de las Ciências, 6(1), 191–207.Google Scholar
  37. Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg, H. J, I. I. I., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saldanha, L. (1996). Explorações submarinas. In D. Reis (Ed.), D Carlos de Bragança–A Paixão do Mar (pp. 30–81). Lisbon: Parque Expo 98, Fundação da Casa de Bragança, Marinha Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  40. Solomon, J. (1991). Teaching about the nature of science in the British national curriculum. Science Education, 75(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2007). School visits to natural history museums: Teaching or enriching? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 747–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wandersee, J. H. (1985). Can the history of science help science educators antecipate students’ misconceptions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wandersee, J. H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weitzman, S. H. (2003). Illustrating fishes. In E. R. S. Hodges, S. Buchanan, J. Cody, & T. Nicholson (Eds.), The guild handbook of scientific illustration (pp. 365–384). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Yip, D.-Y. (2006). Using history to promote understanding of nature of science in science teachers. Teaching Education, 17(2), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cláudia Faria
    • 1
  • Gonçalo Pereira
    • 1
  • Isabel Chagas
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Research in EducationUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations