The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism
- 364 Downloads
That Intelligent Design Creationism rejects the methodological naturalism of modern science in favor of a premodern supernaturalist worldview is well documented and by now well known. An irony that has not been sufficiently appreciated, however, is the way that ID Creationists try to advance their premodern view by adopting (if only tactically) a radical postmodern perspective. This paper will reveal the deep threads of postmodernism that run through the ID Creationist movement’s arguments, as evidenced in the writings and interviews of its key leaders. Seeing their arguments and activities from this perspective highlights the danger to science posed by both ID Creationism and radical postmodernism.
KeywordsIntelligent Design Critical Legal Study Creation Story Discovery Institute Intelligent Design Creationism
- Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bloor, D. (1991 ). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Busey, J. S. (1992). Interview with Phillip Johnson. Spiritual Counterfeits Project Newsletter, 18.Google Scholar
- Cohen, H. F. (1995). The scientific revolution: A historiographic analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Dembski, W. A. (1999). Intelligent design: The bridge between science & theology. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
- Dembski, W. A. (2004). Dealing with the backlash against intelligent design. Version 1.1, from http://www.designinference.com/documents/2004.04.Backlash.htm.
- Dembski, W. A. (2010). Reply to Johnny T. Helms. Our sovereign joy: A book review: The theistic evolution of William A. Dembski of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, “The end of Christianity”. http://oursovereignjoy.blogspot.com/2009/12/book-review-william-dembskis-end-of.html. Accessed 8 January 2010.
- Discovery_Institute (1999) The wedge strategy. Retrieved May, 1999, from http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/archive/thomas_wedge.html.
- Forrest, B. (2001). The wedge at work: How intelligent design creationism is wedging its way into the cultural and academic mainstream. In R. T. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives (pp. 5–53). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Forrest, B., & Gross, P. R. (2003). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The wedge of intelligent design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Glassman, J. (1997). Program no. 739. Techno Politics.Google Scholar
- Goode, S. (1999). Johnson challenges advocates of evolution. Insight. On the News. October 25.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1991). Darwin on trial. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1992a). Darwinists squirm under spotlight. Citizen Magazine. January.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1992b, July). The creationist and the sociobiologist: Two stories about illiberal education. California Law Review, 80.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1993). Nihilism and the end of law. First Things, 31(March), 19–25.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1995a). Open letter to John W. Burgeson (published on the Internet).Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1995b, October). Daniel Dennett’s dangerous idea. The New Criterion, 14, 9.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1996). Paul Feyerabend’s choice for freedom. A review of killing time, the autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Books and Culture.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1997a). Defeating Darwinism. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. E. (1997b) The law written on the heart: A review of written on the heart: the case for natural law by J. Budziszewski. Kitzmiller, Tammy, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al. (400 F. Supp. 2d 707, Docket no. 4cv2688).Google Scholar
- Johnson, P., & Easterbrook, G. (1999). Evolution and the curriculum. Center Conversations: Ethics and Public Policy Center Online, 4.Google Scholar
- Kushiner, J. M. (2002). Berkeley’s radical: An interview with Phillip E. Johnson. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity, 15(5).Google Scholar
- Lawrence, J. (1999). Communiqué interview: Phillip E. Johnson. Communiqué: A Quarterly Journal (Spring).Google Scholar
- Levitt, N. (2006). Steve Fuller and the hidden agenda of social constructivism. Talk Reason, from http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Fuller.cfm.
- Meyer, S. C. (2001). Darwin in the dock. Touchstone Magazine. April 1.Google Scholar
- Pearcey, N. (1990). Anti-Darwinism comes to the university: An interview with Phillip Johnson. Bible-Science Newsletter, 28(6), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Pennock, R. T. (1999). Tower of babel: The evidence against the new creationism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Pennock, R. T. (2004). DNA by design?: Stephen Meyer and the return of the God hypothesis. In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (Eds.), Debating design (pp. 130–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pennock, R. T. (2006). The pre-modern sins of intelligent design. In P. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of science and religion (pp. 732–748). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pennock, R. T. (2007). Biology and religion. In M. Ruse & D. Hull (Eds.), Cambridge companion to philosophy of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Perry, J. (2003). Courtly combatant. World Magazine, 18(48).Google Scholar
- Quinn, M. (2000). The search for intelligent design in the universe. SVMagazine. January 9.Google Scholar
- Silberman, G. (1993). Phil Johnson’s little hobby. The Boalt Hall Cross-Examiner, 6(2), 1, 4, 9–10.Google Scholar
- Slack, G. (2005). Intelligent designer. Salon.com. Oct. 20. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/20/dover_trial.
- Stafford, T. (1997). The making of a revolution. Christianity Today, 41(14).Google Scholar
- Yerxa, D. (2002). Phillip Johnson and the origins of the intelligent design movement, 1977–1991. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 55(1), 47–52.Google Scholar