Science & Education

, Volume 19, Issue 6–8, pp 757–778 | Cite as

The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism

Article

Abstract

That Intelligent Design Creationism rejects the methodological naturalism of modern science in favor of a premodern supernaturalist worldview is well documented and by now well known. An irony that has not been sufficiently appreciated, however, is the way that ID Creationists try to advance their premodern view by adopting (if only tactically) a radical postmodern perspective. This paper will reveal the deep threads of postmodernism that run through the ID Creationist movement’s arguments, as evidenced in the writings and interviews of its key leaders. Seeing their arguments and activities from this perspective highlights the danger to science posed by both ID Creationism and radical postmodernism.

References

  1. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloor, D. (1991 [1976]). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Busey, J. S. (1992). Interview with Phillip Johnson. Spiritual Counterfeits Project Newsletter, 18.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, H. F. (1995). The scientific revolution: A historiographic analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  6. Dembski, W. A. (1999). Intelligent design: The bridge between science & theology. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dembski, W. A. (2004). Dealing with the backlash against intelligent design. Version 1.1, from http://www.designinference.com/documents/2004.04.Backlash.htm.
  8. Dembski, W. A. (2010). Reply to Johnny T. Helms. Our sovereign joy: A book review: The theistic evolution of William A. Dembski of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, “The end of Christianity”. http://oursovereignjoy.blogspot.com/2009/12/book-review-william-dembskis-end-of.html. Accessed 8 January 2010.
  9. Discovery_Institute (1999) The wedge strategy. Retrieved May, 1999, from http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/archive/thomas_wedge.html.
  10. Forrest, B. (2001). The wedge at work: How intelligent design creationism is wedging its way into the cultural and academic mainstream. In R. T. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives (pp. 5–53). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Forrest, B., & Gross, P. R. (2003). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The wedge of intelligent design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Glassman, J. (1997). Program no. 739. Techno Politics.Google Scholar
  13. Goode, S. (1999). Johnson challenges advocates of evolution. Insight. On the News. October 25.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, P. E. (1984). Do you sincerely want to be a radical? Stanford Law Review, 36(1/2), 247–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, P. E. (1991). Darwin on trial. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, P. E. (1992a). Darwinists squirm under spotlight. Citizen Magazine. January.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, P. E. (1992b, July). The creationist and the sociobiologist: Two stories about illiberal education. California Law Review, 80.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, P. E. (1993). Nihilism and the end of law. First Things, 31(March), 19–25.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, P. E. (1995a). Open letter to John W. Burgeson (published on the Internet).Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, P. E. (1995b, October). Daniel Dennett’s dangerous idea. The New Criterion, 14, 9.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, P. E. (1996). Paul Feyerabend’s choice for freedom. A review of killing time, the autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Books and Culture.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, P. E. (1997a). Defeating Darwinism. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, P. E. (1997b) The law written on the heart: A review of written on the heart: the case for natural law by J. Budziszewski. Kitzmiller, Tammy, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al. (400 F. Supp. 2d 707, Docket no. 4cv2688).Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, P., & Easterbrook, G. (1999). Evolution and the curriculum. Center Conversations: Ethics and Public Policy Center Online, 4.Google Scholar
  25. Kushiner, J. M. (2002). Berkeley’s radical: An interview with Phillip E. Johnson. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity, 15(5).Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence, J. (1999). Communiqué interview: Phillip E. Johnson. Communiqué: A Quarterly Journal (Spring).Google Scholar
  27. Levitt, N. (2006). Steve Fuller and the hidden agenda of social constructivism. Talk Reason, from http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Fuller.cfm.
  28. Meyer, S. C. (2001). Darwin in the dock. Touchstone Magazine. April 1.Google Scholar
  29. Pearcey, N. (1990). Anti-Darwinism comes to the university: An interview with Phillip Johnson. Bible-Science Newsletter, 28(6), 6–11.Google Scholar
  30. Pennock, R. T. (1996). Naturalism, evidence and creationism: The case of Phillip Johnson. Biology and Philosophy, 11(4), 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pennock, R. T. (1999). Tower of babel: The evidence against the new creationism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pennock, R. T. (2004). DNA by design?: Stephen Meyer and the return of the God hypothesis. In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (Eds.), Debating design (pp. 130–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pennock, R. T. (2006). The pre-modern sins of intelligent design. In P. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford handbook of science and religion (pp. 732–748). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pennock, R. T. (2007). Biology and religion. In M. Ruse & D. Hull (Eds.), Cambridge companion to philosophy of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perry, J. (2003). Courtly combatant. World Magazine, 18(48).Google Scholar
  36. Quinn, M. (2000). The search for intelligent design in the universe. SVMagazine. January 9.Google Scholar
  37. Ruby, J. E. (1986). The origins of scientific ‘law’. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silberman, G. (1993). Phil Johnson’s little hobby. The Boalt Hall Cross-Examiner, 6(2), 1, 4, 9–10.Google Scholar
  39. Slack, G. (2005). Intelligent designer. Salon.com. Oct. 20. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/20/dover_trial.
  40. Stafford, T. (1997). The making of a revolution. Christianity Today, 41(14).Google Scholar
  41. Yerxa, D. (2002). Phillip Johnson and the origins of the intelligent design movement, 1977–1991. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 55(1), 47–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lyman Briggs College & Departments of Philosophy and Computer Science, E-30 Holmes HallMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations